P v G, P and P (Family Provision: Relevance of Divorce Provision)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Neutral Citation | [2004] EWHC 2944 (Fam) |
| Date | 2004 |
| Year | 2004 |
| Court | Family Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Lilleyman v Lilleyman and another
...of the divorce cross-check and of the identification of reasonable financial provision more generally. 60 I must finally mention P & P [2006] 1 FLR 431, a decision of Black J in December 2004, in which the divorce cross-check was closely analysed in the context of an Inheritance Act claim b......
-
Victoria Frances Goenka v Gopal Goenka (as Executor of the Will of Nirupam Goenka, Deceased, and on his own behalf) and Others
...is said in that regard in the Claimant's witness statement. 70 Mr Clark has taken me to the decision of Mrs Justice Black in the case of P v G, P & P [2004] EW8C 2944 (Fam) reported at [2006] 1 FLR 431. The facts of the case are set out in the head-note. The husband in that case had made a......
-
Pauline Mavis Patricia Lomax v Stuart Andrew Lomax
...being referred to Ilott v Mitson (No 2) [2017] 2 WLR 979 (having heard one of the appeals at High Court Level), and probably also P v G [2006] 1 FLR 431- and I do not. Also, I recall that I did not see in court the Rule itself, either a copy, or in a document. (I cannot remember whether Se......
-
Elizabeth May Ramus v Claire Louise Holt (as executor and beneficiary of the estate of Christopher Stewart Ramus)
...Court considered the assets of Mrs Ramus and the estate at the time of the hearing (as suggested by Black J in P v G, P and P (Family Provision: Relevance of Divorce Provision) [2004] EWHC 2944 (Fam) at [61], [69] (including the £500,000 paid out to Mrs Holt arising from the deceased's pen......