Payne v Weldless Steel Tube Company Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date27 October 1955
Judgment citation (vLex)[1955] EWCA Civ J1027-3
CourtCourt of Appeal
Date27 October 1955

[1955] EWCA Civ J1027-3

In The Supreme Court of Judicature

Court of Appeal

Before:

Lord Justice Denning

Lord Justice Hodson and

Lord Justice Morris

Joseph Bernard Payne
and
The Weldless Steel Tube Company Ltd.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Therefore, I did have se doubt as to exactly what the learned Judge had found. He accepted the evidence of the Plaintiff, and the evidence of the Plaintiff was that while walking in an ordinary way across this floor – for I think the plate must be regarded as part of the floor; it was put there to be walked upon – he puthis foot upon a part of the floor which so rooked as to cause him to overbalance. I wondered, therefore, whether the learned Judge was really intending to find that this floor was in an efficient state and in good repair.

10

My doubts, therefore, have arisen, not in regard to the law on the matter, but in regard to the way in which the learned Judge had dealt with it – which was very largely, I think, because of the way in which he was invited to deal with it. But, having indicated those doubts, I do not dint from the ons expressed by my Lords.

Order: Appeal dismissed with costs. Leave to appeal to the House of Lords refused.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Albert Henry Clarke v British Steel Corporation (a corporate body)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 31 Octubre 1975
    ...read, the learned judge was, Mr. Esyr Lewis points out, relying upon the judgment of Lord Justice Denning (as he then was) in Payne v. Weldless Steel Tube Co. Ltd. (1955 3 Weekly Law Reports 771). Lord Justice Denning said, of a previous enactment of what is now section 28 of the Factories ......
  • Winstanley v T. & J. Harrison Ltd (Defender.)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 25 Junio 1968
    ...JUSTICE EDMUND DAVIES 10 Safety val non is a matter of degree, and it must depend upon the facts of a particular case. In Payne v. Weldless Steel Tube Co. Ltd., reported in 1956 1 Queen's Bench, at page 196, where common law negligence and breaches of Sections 25(1) and 26(1) of the Factori......
  • Keith Thompson (Appellant (Plaintiff) v Yorkshire Imperial Metals Ltd (Respondent
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 16 Marzo 1988
    ...dismiss this appeal. LORD JUSTICE MANN 9 I agree. The matter in my judgment is comprehended by a decision of this court in Payne v. Weldless Steel Tube Company [1955] 3 All E.R. 612, where Lord Justice Denning (as he then was), said that the question as to whether or not a floor was safe wa......
  • Charles Daniel Kockelbergh v Massey Ferguson Tractors Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 29 Junio 1965
    ...the province of the County Court Judge in circumstances such as these, it is the case of ( Payne v. Weldless Steel Tube Co. Ltd. 1956 1 Queen's Bench 196) to which we have been referred by learned counsel for the appellant - very properly, it being a case against him, which he sought to dis......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT