Pearson v Naydler

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtChancery Division
Year1977
Date1977

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
160 cases
  • Amar Hoseen Mohammed Revai v Singapore Airlines Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 20 August 1994
  • Eminent Energy Ltd v Krässik Oü (previously known as Daxin Baltic Oü) Berkeley Energy Services Ltd and Another (Third Parties)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 20 October 2016
    ...and 25.13.13 in the current (2016) edition of Civil Procedure. 9 It is also common ground, as stated by Sir Robert Megarry V-C in Pearson v Naydler2, that .. the inability of the plaintiff company to pay the defendants' costs is a matter which not only opens the jurisdiction, but also provi......
  • JM Bodden & Son Intl Ltd v Dettling
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 25 January 1991
    ...Lindsay) & Co. Ltd. v. Triplan Ltd., [1973] Q.B. 609; [1973] 2 All E.R. 273, dictum of Lawton, L.J. applied. (3) Pearson v. Naydler, [1977] 1 W.L.R. 899; [1977] 3 All E.R. 531, dicta of Megarry, V.-C. applied. (4) Prospect Properties Ltd. v. McNeill, 1990–91 CILR 171. (5) Trident Intl. Frei......
  • Amex Electrical Ltd. v. 726934 Alberta Ltd. et al.
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 15 January 2014
    ...86 A.R. 268; 51 D.L.R.(4th) 529 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 42]. Crothers v. Simpson Sears Ltd. - see Singh v. Dura. Pearson v. Naydler, [1977] 3 All E.R. 531 (Ch.), refd to. [para. Wall v. 679927 Ontario Ltd. et al. (1999), 176 N.S.R.(2d) 96; 538 A.P.R. 96; 29 C.P.C.(4th) 204 (C.A.), refd to. ......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • Financing The Cost Of The Asset Recovery Process - Part 2
    • British Virgin Islands
    • Mondaq Virgin Islands
    • 6 July 2008
    ...the security is given.' 30. See Farrer v Lacy, Hartland & Co (1885) 28 Ch D 482 at 485 per Bowen LJ. 31. See Pearson v Naydler [1977] 3 All ER 531 at 537, [1977] 1 WLR899 at 906. 32. Keary Developments Ltd v Tarmac Construction Ltd and another [1995] 3 All ER 534, [1995] 2 BCLC 395, LR ......
2 books & journal articles
  • Litigation
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume III - Third Edition
    • 13 April 2020
    ...2 QB 221 at 224, per Nield J. 673 Jefery & Katauskas Pty Ltd v SST Consulting Pty Ltd [2009] HCA 43 at [38]. 674 Pearson v Naydler [1977] 1 WLR 899 at 906, per Sir Robert Megarry V-C; BJ Crabtree (Insulation) Ltd v GPT Communication Systems Ltd (1990) 59 BLR 43 at 50–51, per Bingham LJ. Fur......
  • Civil Procedure
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2008, December 2008
    • 1 December 2008
    ...may also be useful to the reader: Ho Wing On Christopher v ECRC Land Pte Ltd[2006] 4 SLR 817 at [71]—[72]; Pearson v Naydler[1977] 3 All ER 531; Trident International Freight Services v Manchester Ship Canal Co(1990) BCLC 263; and National Bank of New Zealand Pte Ltd v Donald Export Trading......