Peters v Peters

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1967
Date1967
CourtProbate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2 cases
  • Kd (Otherwise C) v Mc
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 1 January 1987
    ...[1975] 1 W.L.R. 863; [1976] 1 All E.R. 123. Brown v. Brown [1968] P. 518; [1968] 2 All E.R. 11; [1968] 2 W.L.R. 969. Peters v. Peters [1968] P. 275; [1967] 3 W.L.R. 1235; [1967] 2 All E.R. 318. Mather v. Mahoney [1968] 3 All E.R. 233; [1968] 1 W.L.R. 1773. Olympia Productions v. Olympia The......
  • Hornett v Hornett
    • United Kingdom
    • Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • Invalid date
    ...2 All E.R. 219. Middleton v. Middleton [1967] P. 62; [1966] 2 W.L.R. 512; [1966] 1 All E.R. 168. Peters v. Peters [1968] P. 275; [1967] 3 W.L.R. 1235; [1967] 3 All E.R. This was a petition by the husband, for a declaration that a judgment of divorce granted to the wife on June 3, 1924, by t......
3 books & journal articles
  • Leftist Insurgency in Democracies
    • United States
    • Sage Comparative Political Studies No. 54-3-4, March 2021
    • 1 March 2021
    ...may experience leftist revolts, but that they do not succeed in overthrow-ing governments (Goodwin and Skocpol, 1989, p. 495). Huntington (1968, p. 275) for instance, argues, that successful great revolutions “do not occur in democratic political systems.” Goodwin (2001) writes that “the ba......
  • Practical Obstacles to Effective Manpower Planning
    • United Kingdom
    • Emerald Personnel Review No. 1-3, March 1972
    • 1 March 1972
    ...do not generally register themselves as such. 25 Myers (1969) pl0. 26 Phillips (1958). 27 Lipsey (1962) in McCormick and Owen Smith (1968) p275. 28 Joseph (1966); Myers (1969) pp20-22. 29Mycrs (1969) pp33 et seq. 30 Orcutt, Greenberger, Korbel and Rivilin (1961), espec ppl61-231. 31 c f Fig......
  • Mentefacts as a missing level in theory of information science
    • United Kingdom
    • Emerald Journal of Documentation No. 74-6, October 2018
    • 8 October 2018
    ...(CRG, 1968, p. 285).Mentefacts are also correlated with “Symbolic”concepts in J.P. Guildford’s typology ofconcepts in the intellect (CRG, 1968, p. 275) and with “Abstracts”in a table of unit conceptsthat had been proposed by CRG member J.E.L. Farradane (276). Unfortunately, the samebulletin......
4 provisions
  • Customs Duties (ECSC) (No. 2) (Amendment No. 5) Order 1986
    • United Kingdom
    • UK Non-devolved
    • 1 January 1986
    ...2, paragraphs 3 and 5. (b) S.I. 1985/1630, amended by S.I. 1985/2020, 1986/348, 813 and 1352. (c) OJ No. L172, 22.7.1986, p. 1, OJ/SE 1968 (1) p. 275. (d) OJ No. L. 345, 8.12.86, p.1. (e) S.I. 1986/2178. EXPLANATORY NOTE (This Note is not part of the Order.) This Order amends the Customs Du......
  • Customs Duties (ECSC) (No. 2) (Amendment) Order 1985
    • United Kingdom
    • UK Non-devolved
    • 1 January 1985
    ...and Excise Duties (General Reliefs) Act 1979 (c.3), Schedule 2, paragraph 3. (b) S.I. 1985/1630. (c) OJ No. L172, 22.7.1968, p.l, OJ/SE 1968 (1) p.275. (d) OJ No. L331, 9.12.1985, p.l. EXPLANATORY NOTE (This Note is not part of the Order.) This Order amends the Customs Duties (ECSC) (No. 2)......
  • Value Added Tax (Imported Goods) Relief (Amendment) (No.2) Order 1987
    • United Kingdom
    • UK Non-devolved
    • 1 January 1987
    ...(1) OJNo. L105, 23.4.83, p.38. (2) OJNo. L145, 13.6.77, p.1. (3) Council Regulation (EEC) No. 950/68, OJNo. L172, 22.7.68, p.1. (OJ/SE 1968(1) p.275) as last amended by Council Regulation (EEC) No. 3618/86, OJNo. L345, 8.12.86, (4) Council Regulation (EEC) No. 2658/87, OJNo. L256, 7.9.87, p......
  • Value Added Tax (Imported Goods) Relief (Amendment) Order 1988
    • United Kingdom
    • UK Non-devolved
    • 1 January 1988
    ...Council Regulation (EEC) No. 2658/87, OJNo. L256, 7.9.87, p.1. (4) Council Regulation (EEC) No. 950/68, OJNo. L172, 22.7.68, p.1 (OJ/SE 1968(1) p.275). (5) 1983 c. (6) S.I.1984/746, as amended by S.I.1987/155, 2108.

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT