Petrotrade Inc. v Texaco Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
| Judge | Lord Woolf MR,Clarke,Latham L JJ |
| Judgment Date | 23 May 2000 |
| Date | 23 May 2000 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
89 cases
-
Re Otu
...Court, Financial Services Division (Foster, J.) IN THE MATTER OF OTU Cases cited: (1) Petrotrade Inc. v. Texaco Ltd., [2001] 4 All E.R. 853; [2001] C.P. Rep. 29; [2000] CLC 1341; [2002] 1 Costs L.R. 60; noted at [2002] 1 W.L.R. 947, distinguished. (2) Wing Fai Construction Co. Ltd. (Costs: ......
-
McPhilemy v Times Newspapers Ltd (No. 2)
... ... 10 In Petrotrade Incorporated v Texaco Limited(unreported, 23 May 2000) this Court explained why an order for the ... ...
-
Jones MP v Associated Newspapers Ltd
...34 In the event, however, this stage will not be reached because I have held that the threshold criteria set out in CPRPetrograde Inc v Texaco Ltd (Note) [2002] 1 WLR 947 and McPhilemy v Times Newspapers Ltd (No. 2) [2002] 1 WLR 934 that the costs regime under CPR Part 36 should not be rega......
-
Telefónica UK Ltd v The Office of Communications
...16 Lord Woolf MR explained the purpose of and approach to the enhancements under (what is now) CPR 36.17 in Petrotrade Inc v Texaco Ltd (Note) [2002] 1 WLR 947 as follows: “64. The power to order indemnity costs or higher rate of interest is a means of achieving a fairer result for the clam......
Get Started for Free
9 books & journal articles
-
Litigation
...rule 36.17(4). As to the calculation of the “additional amount”, see CPR rule 36.17(4)(d). See also Petrotrade Inc v Texaco Ltd (Note) [2002] 1 WLR 947 (CA); Eiles v London Borough of Southwark [2006] EWHC 2014 (TCC). 1218 CPR rule 36.13. As to the basis on which costs are to be paid (ie, s......
-
The Merits of the Merits in the Class Certification Analysis
...Ibid., pts. 36.5, 36.21. See also, for example, Supreme Court Costs Office, above note 104 at [2.18]; Petrotrade Inc v. Texaco Ltd, [2001] 4 All E.R. 853, [2002] 1 W.L.R. 947 at para. 56. CPR 32.21 provides claimants incentives to make offers to settle. Lownds, above note 119 at para.8. 151......
-
Cross-border Collaboration By Class Counsel in the U.S. and Ontario
...Ibid., pts. 36.5, 36.21. See also, for example, Supreme Court Costs Office, above note 104 at [2.18]; Petrotrade Inc v. Texaco Ltd, [2001] 4 All E.R. 853, [2002] 1 W.L.R. 947 at para. 56. CPR 32.21 provides claimants incentives to make offers to settle. Lownds, above note 119 at para.8. 151......
-
Book Review: The Modern Cy-près Doctrine: Applications and Implications By Rachael P. Mulheron (2006)
...Ibid., pts. 36.5, 36.21. See also, for example, Supreme Court Costs Office, above note 104 at [2.18]; Petrotrade Inc v. Texaco Ltd, [2001] 4 All E.R. 853, [2002] 1 W.L.R. 947 at para. 56. CPR 32.21 provides claimants incentives to make offers to settle. Lownds, above note 119 at para.8. 151......
Get Started for Free