Popat v Shonchhatra
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 04 April 1995 |
| Date | 04 April 1995 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
Sandhu v Gill
...LJ observed at 1372A, although it appears to me that I was guilty of using the wrong terminology rather than the wrong figures (see at [1995] 1 WLR 908 at 914B-C). Sixthly, the commercial unjustness of giving section 42(1) the meaning adopted below was simply not considered in Popat's case......
-
Nihal Mohammed Kamal Brake v Duncan Kenric Swift (as trustee of the estates of Nihal Brake and Andrew Brake)
...necessary to see what happens to assets which belong to a partnership rather than to individuals who are not in partnership. Thus, in Popat v Shonchantra [1997] 1 WLR 1367, CA, Nourse LJ, with whom Evans LJ and Sir Ralph Gibson agreed, said: “On 29 September 1989, when the leasehold premis......
-
Appeal From The Sheriff Appeal Court By Dr Andrei Sheveleu Against Drs Andrew Brown And Christopher Ducker
...discussed in Lindley & Banks On Partnership (20th edit) at paras 20-43 et seq under reference to, among other cases, Popat v Shonchhatra [1995] 1 WLR 908, David Neuberger QC sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge at 913H and Emerson v Estate of Emerson [2004] 1 BCLC 575. As can be seen from t......
-
Kenneth Davies v Stephen Ford
...1 WLR 815, Boardman v Phipps [1967] 2 AC 46. This is common ground. The grant of an allowance is discretionary: see, for example, Poppet v Shonchhatra [1997] 1 WLR 1367 and the Warman case at page 562. In the passage cited from the WARMAN case the High Court of Australia had said: It is fo......
Request a trial to view additional results