Powell v Smith
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1865 |
| Year | 1865 |
| Court | Equity |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
AMB Generall Holding AG v Manches and Others
...which an ordinary person would have discovered, at any rate if the third party seeks to impose liability on him.". He further relied on Powell v Smith 14 Equity 85 as authority for the proposition that the ratification is effective, notwithstanding a mistake as to the construction of the ag......
-
AMB Generali Holding AG v SEB Trygg LIV Holding AB
...184.Morgan Est (Scotland) Ltd v Hanson Concrete Products LtdWLR[2005] 1 WLR 2557.Nelson v NelsonWLR[1997] 1 WLR 233.Powell v SmithELR(1872) LR 14 Eq 85.Roache v News Group Newspapers Ltd[1998] EMLR 161.Rockland Industries Inc v Amerada Minerals Corp of Canada Ltd[1980] 2 SCR 2. Sardinia Sul......
- AMB Generall Holding AG v Manches and Others
-
Sampson v Union and Rhodesia Wholesale Ltd (In Liquidation)
...(p. 108, para. 111, p. 122, 1929 AD p473 para. 113, p. 113 note); Midland Railway v Johson (108, R.R. 313 at p. 319); Powell v Smith (14 Eq. 85 at pp. 89-90); Cooper v Phibbs (L.R. 2 H.L. 170); Rooth v The State (2 S.A.R. 257) and authorities there cited; Estate Jonson v Estate Jonson (1926......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
CONCEPT OF NON EST FACTUM
...his own mistake or that of his adviser: - (Saunders v. Anglia Building Society (1971) A.C. 1004 at 1016 per Lord Reid. Powell v. Smith 1872 LR 14 Eq. 85; Tamplin v. James (1880) 15 Ch. D. 215 C.A; Steward v. Kennedy (No. 2) (1890) 15 App Cas 108 HL On the authorities, the plea of the plaint......