Pre-trial withdrawals: Trial, bargain, or pseudo-bargain?
| Date | 01 December 1983 |
| Published date | 01 December 1983 |
| DOI | 10.1177/000486908301600403 |
| Author | Roger Douglas |
| Subject Matter | Original Articles |
210 (1983) 16
ANZJ
CRIM
PRE-TRIAL WITHDRAWALS: TRIAL, BARGAIN,
OR
PSEUDO-BARGAIN?
Roger Douglas*
Abstract
An analysis of the correlates of pre-trial withdrawals in Melbourne magistrates'
court cases suggests that withdrawals are largely a reponse to plea and to whether
defendants were legally represented. Where defendants were willing to plead guilty
to remaining charges, withdrawals appear to have been more likely where the
prosecution case was weak. Although pre-trial withdrawals appear to be the
outcome of a bargaining process, the value of withdrawals appears to be limited,
especially in their impact on sentence.
In many US jurisdictions, cases are frequently disposed of by a decision by the
prosecutor to withdraw the charges against the defendant. In
other
cases, some
charges are withdrawn and others reduced. In some cases withdrawals reflect no
more than an assessment by the prosecutor that the case should not proceed.
The
complainant may want the charges withdrawn. Key witnesses may be unavailable.
However, withdrawals are frequently aresponse to some type of negotiation.
Sometimes the negotiation may involve a process analogous to trial and the defence
may succeed in persuading the prosecutor that the prosecution case is so weak
that
it would be a waste of time to take it to trial. Often the bargain involves an
agreement whereby the defendant pleads guilty to some charges in exchange for the
withdrawal of others. In some cases the bargain may be a genuine one, but in
others, bargaining may represent "pseudo-bargaining": charges may be withdrawn,
but the sentence the defendant receives may in fact be identical to what he would
have received had no charges been withdrawn.
In Australia, charge withdrawal is far less widespread than is the case in many
American jurisdictions, but it nonetheless takes place. This study represents an
examination of the correlates of charge withdrawal in six Melbourne magistrates'
courts.
For
methodological reason it has not been possible to examine the determinants
of charge withdrawals in cases where all charges were withdrawn. However, these
are the exceptions. Charge withdrawal usually involves withdrawal of only some of
the charges which make up magistrates' court cases, and it is possible to explore the
correlates of withdrawals in these cases.
I shall be arguing that charge withdrawal bears a rather complex relationship to
the strength of the prosecution case, but is strongly related to plea and
representation and in such a way as to suggest that withdrawals are the result of a
bargaining process. However, the benefits of pre-trial withdrawals appear to be
largely illusory. Defendants who fail to benefit from pre-trial withdrawals
sometimes benefit from post-conviction withdrawals. Sentence appears to be
unaffected by whether or not charges have been withdrawn.
*Department of Legal Studies, La Trobe University, Bundoora.
To continue reading
Request your trial