President of the Methodist Conference v Parfitt

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1984
Date1984
Year1983
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
23 cases
  • Preston (formerly Moore) v President of the Methodist Conference
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 15 Mayo 2013
    ...a stipend, save in accordance with the procedures set forth in the book of rules." 6 President of the Methodist Conference v Parfitt [1984] QB 368 was a decision of the Court of Appeal on a claim for unfair dismissal by a Methodist minister. It is therefore directly in point on the present ......
  • Sharpe v The Bishop of Worcester (in his corporate capacity)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 30 Abril 2015
    ...of the functions of the minister in the absence of clear indications to the contrary: President of the Methodist Conference v Parfitt [1984] QB 368. 62 Diocese of Southwark v Coker [1998] ICR 140 , a decision of this court, concerned an assistant curate of a Church of England parish who ......
  • New Testament Church of God v Stewart
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 19 Octubre 2007
    ...... the Tribunal's findings by the decisions of this court in President of the Methodist Conference v Parfitt [1984] ICR 176 and Diocese of ......
  • E v English Province of Our Lady of Charity and another
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 12 Julio 2012
    ...for services than a contract of service: pp 26–27. 9. The Court of Appeal decision in President of the Methodist Conference v Parfitt [1984] QB 368 concerned an unfair dismissal claim brought by a Methodist minister. The issue was whether the parties had entered into a contract of service. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • ENVISIONING THE JUDICIAL ABOLITION OF THE DOCTRINE OF CONSIDERATION IN SINGAPORE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2011, December 2011
    • 1 Diciembre 2011
    ...men and women usually do not intend to create legal rights and obligations”). 211 President of the Methodist Conference v Parfit [1984] QB 368 at 378. 212 [2005] UKHL 73. 213 H G Beale ed, Chitty on Contracts (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 30th Ed, 2008) at para 2-181. 214 New Testament Church o......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT