Proform Sports Management Ltd v Proactive Sports Management Ltd and Another

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date26 July 2006
Neutral Citation[2006] EWHC 2903 (Ch),[2006] EWHC 2812 (Ch)
Date26 July 2006
CourtChancery Division

CHANCERY DIVISION

Before Judge Hodge, QC

Proform Sports Management Ltd
and
Proactive Sports Management Ltd and Another
Contract with agents made aged 15 is voidable by footballer

AN AGREEMENT between a child footballer and his agent was not analogous to contracts of employment, apprenticeship or education and was voidable at the option of the footballer.

Judge Hodge, QC, so held in Manchester District Registry of the Chancery Division allowing an application by the defendants, Proactive Sports Management Ltd and Paul Stretford, for summary judgment in a claim brought by Proform Sports Management Ltd.

Proform entered into a player representation agreement with Wayne Rooney, under which he appointed them to act as his executive agents and to represent him in all matters relating to his work as a professional footballer. That agreement was entered into when Mr Rooney was and 15 and already with Everton Football Club as a trainee.

Proform alleged that, during the currency of the agreement, Proactive also entered into a player representation agreement with Mr Rooney. They brought an action for damages for unlawful interference with and/or the procuring of a breach of the contract.

Mr Victor Joffe, QC, and Mr David Casement for the defendants; Mr Timothy King, QC, for the claimants.

JUDGE HODGE said he agreed with Mr Justice Slade's assumption inGreig v InsoleWLR ((1978) 1 WLR 302) that it was not a tort for a third party to induce a person to exercise a lawful right to rescind a contract.

It followed logically, that it was also not a tort to procure the breach of a voidable contract, at least where the person induced was the person who enjoyed the right to rescind.

That conclusion made it necessary to decide whether the agreement was voidable by Mr Rooney. The general rule was that a minor's contract was voidable at his option, the exception being contracts for necessaries. "Necessaries" included contracts of apprenticeship...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Proactive Sports Management Ltd v Rooney and another
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 15 July 2010
    ...Judge Hodge QC, sitting as a Judge of the High Court, in Proform Sports Management Limited v Proactive Sports Management Limited [2006] EWHC 2903 (Ch); [2007] Bus. L.R. 93. 9 The Defendant in that action (“Proactive”) is, in fact, the Claimant in the present proceedings. Proactive is a com......
  • Sherma Charles v Aul Charles
    • Grenada
    • High Court (Grenada)
    • 26 September 2023
    ...entered by a minor is voidable at the instance of the minor 2. Counsel relies on the authority in Proform Sports Management Ltd v Proactive Sports Managements Ltd and another 3 where it is stated that a minor could validly enter into certain contracts, and that contracts with a minor are no......
  • Sherma Charles v Aul Charles
    • Grenada
    • High Court (Grenada)
    • 26 September 2023
    ...entered by a minor is voidable at the instance of the minor 2. Counsel relies on the authority in Proform Sports Management Ltd v Proactive Sports Managements Ltd and another 3 where it is stated that a minor could validly enter into certain contracts, and that contracts with a minor are no......
2 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT