Qureshi v Qureshi

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1971
Date1971
CourtProbate, Divorce and Admiralty Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
28 cases
  • Wheeler v Wheeler
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 29 July 1997
    ...E.R. 424; on further appeal, [1980] A.C. 744; [1979] 3 All E.R. 897, dicta of Wood J. and Lord Scarman applied. (15) Qureshi v. Qureshi, [1972] Fam. 173; [1971] 1 All E.R. 325, distinguished. (16) Russell v. Russell, [1957] P. 375; [1957] 1 All E.R. 929. (17) S Trust, In re, 1990-91 CILR N-......
  • PP v Seeralan
    • Malaysia
    • Supreme Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Chaudhary v Chaudhary
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 31 July 1984
    ...section was passed to modify what Parliament regarded as an anomalous consequence of the Law as declared by the President in Quereshi, (1972) Family, 173. 18 Though on the facts in Quereshi (supra) the President was not dealing with a "bare talaq", the principle declared in Quereshi clearl......
  • Vervaeke (formerly Messina) v Smith
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • Invalid date
    ...D.L.R. (2d) 403. Quazi v. Quazi [1980] A.C. 744; [1979] 3 W.L.R. 402; [1979] 3 All E.R. 424, C.A. Qureshi v. Qureshi [1972] Fam. 173; [1971] 2 W.L.R. 518; [1971] 1 All E.R. Ramsay-Fairfax (orse. Scott-Gibson) v. Ramsay-Fairfax [1956] P. 115; [1955] 3 W.L.R. 849; [1955] 3 All E.R. 695, C.A. ......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Conflict of Laws
    • 8 September 2010
    ...552, 2008 NSSC 353............................................................................................. 410 Qureshi v. Qureshi, [1972] Fam. 173 ........................................... 414, 416, 417, 421 R. (Abduction: Habitual Residence), Re (2003), [2004] 1 F.L.R. 216, [2003] E......
  • Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Conflict of Laws
    • 8 September 2010
    ...v. Rowland (1973), 2 O.R. (2d) 161 (H.C.J.). 68 See the discussion of this legislation in several cases such as Qureshi v. Qureshi , [1972] Fam. 173 [ Qureshi ]; Amin v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration ), [2008] 4 F.C.R. 531 (Fed. Ct.) [ Amin ]. 69 Above note 2. Divorce 415 ......