R v AD

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeMr Justice Turner
Judgment Date29 April 2016
Neutral Citation[2016] EWCA Crim 454
Docket NumberCase No: 201500783 B4
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Date29 April 2016

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • R v Darroux
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 4 May 2018
    ...where the counts were misstated by obvious clerical slip or drafting error as occurred in cases such as Stocker [2014] 1 Cr. App. R 18 and D (A) [2016] 2 Cr. App. R 18. To the contrary, this was a conscious prosecutorial decision to charge theft rather than fraud by false representation. Be......
  • R (Respondent) Simon Walker (Appellant)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 6 April 2017
    ...review on the effect of defects in an indictment as was conducted in R. v Stocker [2013] EWCA Crim 1993. [2014] 1 Cr. App. R. 18 and R. v AD [2016] EWCA Crim 454. 32 We extract from them the following principles: i) The test for this court remains one of safety of the conviction. ii) There......
  • R v T F
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 18 December 2018
    ...offence; and (2) the jury must have been satisfied of fact which proved the appellant guilty of that other offence. 27 In R v D (A) [2016] 2 Cr App R 18, this Court considered an indictment which mistakenly charged the offence under s 14 of the Sexual Offences Act 1956 which concerned indec......
  • R v Dennis Tonkin
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 29 January 2019
    ...23 and 24 and Forbes at paragraphs 56–59).” 21 (The citation for Stocker is 2014 1 Cr.App.R 18, [2013] EWCA Crim. 1993 and for AD [2016] EWCA Crim. 454) 22 In a similar vein, in the decision of this court in R v Wilson [2014] 1 Cr.App.R 10, [2013] EWCA Crim. 1780, a case which involved......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Court of Appeal
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 82-4, August 2018
    • 1 August 2018
    ...of some other offence].’ (at [69]) In applying this interpretation emphasised in RvGraham[1997] 1 Cr App R 302 and RvAD [2016] EWCA Crim 454 his Lordship asserted that ‘A thief is notnecessarily a fraudster. A fraudster is not necessarily a thief’ (at [68]). The lesson the Court were keento......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT