R v Arshad Mahmood
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | Lord Justice Elias,Mr Justice Saunders |
| Judgment Date | 19 April 2013 |
| Neutral Citation | [2013] EWCA Crim 742 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Docket Number | No. 2012/02997/B1 |
| Date | 19 April 2013 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
Aubrey Carlston Darling v R
...the jury assess the overall picture of the crucial events; hence, it is not unfair that he should not be called.’ 21. In R v Mahmood [2013] EWCA Crim 742 the English Court of Appeal said: “It is clear from those principles that the prosecution are obliged to call only witnesses whose state......
-
Xavient Taylor v R
...the jury assess the overall picture of the crucial events; hence, it is not unfair that he should not be called.’ 21. In R v Mahmood [2013] EWCA Crim 742 the English Court of Appeal said: ‘It is clear from those principles that the prosecution are obliged to call only witnesses whose state......
-
Garvin Pratt v R
...354 considered Prince Daniel McPhee v R SCCrimApp. No. 128 of 2012 mentioned R v Nye and Loan 66 Cr. App. R. 252 applied R v Mahmood [2013] EWCA Crim 742 considered R v Russell-Jones [1995] 1 Cr. App. R. 538 considered R v Turnbull 80 Cr. App. R. 104 considered Ratten v R [1972] AC ......