R v Bateman
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1925 |
| Year | 1925 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
16 cases
- R v Northavon District Council, ex parte Smith (pet. all.)
-
R v Adomako
...It is not given to everyone to be a skilful surgeon, but it is given to every one to keep sober when such a duty has to be performed." 4In Bateman 1925 19 CAR 8 a case charging manslaughter against a doctor, Lord Hewart CJ said at page 11: "In explaining to juries the test which they should......
-
Brown (Uriah) v The Queen
...it is a sufficient direction to the jury to adopt the gross negligence test set out by the Court of Appeal in the present case following Rex v Bateman, 19 Cr.App.R. 8 and Andrews v Director of Public Prosecutions [1937] AC 576 and that it is not necessary to refer to the definition of rec......
-
Rondel v Worsley
...that the liability he incurred in point of law is somewhat hard upon him: but still I cannot doubt that he is liable." 45In the case of Rex v. Bateman in 1925, 94 L.J.K.B. 791, it was said in the judgment of the court at page 794 in reference to the civil liability of a medical man— "If a p......
Request a trial to view additional results