R v Chappell
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judge | THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE |
Judgment Date | 24 May 1984 |
Neutral Citation | [1984] EWCA Crim J0524-8 |
Judgment citation (vLex) | [1984] EWCA Crim J0524-2 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
Date | 24 May 1984 |
Docket Number | No. 4168/A/83 |
To continue reading
Request your trial1 cases
-
Clark and Another v in Focus Asset Management & Tax Solutions Ltd Financial Ombudsman Service (Intervener)
...Parliament is aware of the issue of res judicata and, when it wishes to do so, excludes the doctrine. 110 Mr Wolman goes on to rely on R v Chappell (1985) 80 Cr App R 31, where the Criminal Division of this Court held that the civil and criminal remedies for compensation were not co-extensi......
2 books & journal articles
-
Compensation Across Europe: A Quest for Best Practice1
*
...and losses suffered as a consequence of the offence, civil liability for the loss does not actually have to be established (Chappell (1984) 80 Cr App R 31). The order is made for an amount that the court considers appropriate, after taking into account the means of the offender (Powers of C......
-
Compensation Across Europe: A Quest for Best Practice1
*
...and losses suffered as a consequence of the offence, civil liability for the loss does not actually have to be established (Chappell (1984) 80 Cr App R 31). The order is made for an amount that the court considers appropriate, after taking into account the means of the offender (Powers of C......