R v Chisholm (John)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | LORD JUSTICE LATHAM,LORD JUSTICE TOULSON |
| Judgment Date | 03 February 2010 |
| Neutral Citation | [2008] EWCA Crim 3228,[2010] EWCA Crim 258 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Docket Number | No: 200900940 D5 / 200901536 D5,No: 2008/06454 D5 |
| Date | 03 February 2010 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
8 cases
-
R v Russell Knaggs
...but not limited to, the obtaining of such evidence abroad. (4) Concluded, after considering the decisions in R v H [2004] 2 AC 134, R v Chisholm [2010] EWCA Crim 258 and R v Austin [2013] 2 Cr App R 33 (“ Austin No. 3”), that it would be a matter for the constitution of the Court which ulti......
-
Officers C, D, H and R’s Application - Officer A’s application - Jordan’s (Hugh) Application
...the legislature’s view as to how best to address the countervailing interests of the accused, the victim and the public. In R v C [2008] EWCA Crim 3228 the Court of Appeal stressed that anonymity orders should not be made the subject of interlocutory appeals as only at the trial could their......
-
R v Austin (Herbert)
...subject to the necessary limitations. 80 The practice as to the use of Special Counsel at the appeal stage was reviewed by this court in R –v—Chisholm [2010] EWCA Crim 258. In that case, at paragraphs 44 to 52, Toulson LJ gave the court's views in the form of "some tentative observations ab......
-
R v Robert Rich and Others
...of submissions by special counsel in due course. 1.17 The Appellants placed reliance on three authorities: R v H and C [2004] 2 AC 134, R v Chisholm [2010] EWCA Crim 258 and R v Austin [2013] 2 Cr. App. R 33. In particular, reliance was placed upon the potential breadth of the role of speci......
Request a trial to view additional results