R v Ellis
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1899 |
| Date | 1899 |
| Court | Court for Crown Cases Reserved |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
28 cases
- R v Peter Richard Osborne
-
AG v Garland
...v Kelly [1971] IR 132 and Hanlon v Fleming [1981] IR 489; Wilson v Sheehan [1979] IR 423; DPP v Stonehouse [1978] AC 55 and Reg v Ellis [1899] 1 QB 230 considered - Reg v Manning [1999] QB 980 and Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1 distinguished - Extradition Act 1965 (Part II) (No 22) Orde......
-
R (Purdy) v DPP
...4) [2004] QB 1418.Secondly, the authorities cited by Professor Hirst do not bear the weight that he ascribes to them. (i) In R v Ellis [1899] 1 QB 230, where the accused had obtained goods in Durham as a result of false representations made in Glasgow, the Court for Crown Cases Reserved hel......
-
Secretary of State for Trade v Markus; R v Markus
...did not make it an ingredient of the offence that money or property should be obtained as the result of the inducement, cases such as R. v. Ellis [1899] 1 Q.B. 230, where the English court was held to have jurisdiction when the property was obtained in England though the false pretences wer......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
From famine to feast. The prosecution of multi‐jurisdictional financial crime in the electronic age
...occurred: see R. v. Libman, [1985] 2 S.C.R. 178 at para. 23. To add to the confusion,starting with the seminal case of R. v. Ellis, [1899] 1 Q.B. 230, a case of obtaining goods by falsepretences, courts regularly appear to have applied the gist of the offence and terminatorytheory interchan......