R v F
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | Lord Justice Jackson |
| Judgment Date | 24 March 2011 |
| Neutral Citation | [2011] EWCA Crim 726 |
| Docket Number | Case No: D1/201002010 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Date | 24 March 2011 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
9 cases
-
R v F
...95 Cr App R 296, R v JAK [1992] Crim LR 30, R v Dutton [1994] Crim LR 910, R v Jenkins [1998] Crim LR 411, R v Turner, 27 th March 2000, R v MJT 27 th July 2000, R v O'Dell 10 November 2000, Attorney General's Reference No 2 of 2001 [2001] EWCA Crim 1568, R v Bell [2003] 2 Cr App R 13, R v ......
-
CT v R
...above n 4, at [10]. 59 R v [CT] DC Rotorua CRI-2012-063-916, 8 March 2013. 60 See, for example, R v Jacobi, above n 5; and R v TBF [2011] EWCA Crim 726. 61 See the majority's reasons at [41] and 62 That being whether the circumstances relating to the evidence provide a reasonable assurance......
-
Director of Public Prosecutions v Patrick O’Neill
...all these factors, a judge's assessment is that a fair trial will be possible, a stay should not be granted.” 21. See also R v F [2011] EWCA Crim 726 at paragraphs 37-39. 22. It can thus be seen, in relation to the present case, the defendant is required to show three things: firstly, that ......
-
Queen v Robert Rodgers
...he was not involved in the murder. [35] The principles governing the approach to abuse of process applications were set out in R v F [2011] EWCA Crim 726: “i) The court should stay proceedings on some or all counts of the indictment for abuse of process if, and only if, it is satisfied on b......
Get Started for Free