R v Flattery
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1876 |
| Year | 1876 |
| Court | Court for Crown Cases Reserved |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
20 cases
-
R v Williams (Owen Richard)
... ... Held, that the appellant was properly convicted of rape ... Reg. v. O'Shay (1898) 19 Cox, C. C. 76 overruled ... Reg. v. Case (1850) 4 Cox, C. C. 220; 19 L.J. (M.C.) 174 and Reg. v. Flattery (1877) 2 Q. B. D. 410 approved and followed ... APPEAL from a conviction ... The appellant, Owen Richard Williams, was tried at the Liverpool Assizes upon an indictment which charged him in two counts with having had carnal knowledge of Vera Howley without her consent on January 17 and April 28, ... ...
- R v Tabassum
- R v Morgan
-
R. v. Cuerrier (H.G.), (1998) 229 N.R. 279 (SCC)
...Maurantonio, [1968] 1 O.R. 145 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 131]. R. v. Dee (1884), 14 L.R. Ir. 468, refd to. [para. 134]. R. v. Flattery (1877), 2 Q.B.D. 410 (C.R.R.), refd to. [para. Hegarty v. Shine (1878), 14 Cox C.C. 145, refd to. [para. 135]. R. v. Case (1850), 1 Den. 580; 169 E.R. 381 (C.......
Get Started for Free
11 books & journal articles
-
The Concept of Consent under the Sexual Offences Act 2003
...by promising to pay £25 which henever intended to pay had not committed rape because the reality of the97 See, e.g., Rv Flattery (1877) 2 QBD 410; Rv Williams [1923] 1 KB 340.98 J. R. Spencer, ‘Three New Cases on Consent’ (2007) CLJ 490 at 491, referring to Rv Tabassum [2000] 2 Cr App R 328......
-
HIV, Trust and the Criminal Law
...does not relate to the ‘nature’of the act.6 Examples of such deceptions leading to convictions for rape can be found in R vFlattery (1887) 2 QBD 410 and R v Williams (Owen Richard) [1923] 1 KB 340. InFlattery, a conviction for rape was upheld when the defendant, purporting topossess medical......
-
Ten years on
...quoting with approval from Malone, above n. 9.13. Re Williams (1923) 17 Cr App R 56 or a surgical procedure to cure fits Re Flattery (1877) 2 QBD 410.14. Tabassum [2000] 2 Cr App R 328.15. SOA 1956, s. 1(3) as amended by the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 (previously found in s.......
-
Why has the Concept of Consent Proven So Difficult to Clarify?
...as mentioned in Chapter 2.70. Home Office, above n. 2 at para. 2.18.4.71. Law Commission, above n. 67 at para. 5.25.72. RvFlattery (1877) 2 QBD 410.73. RvTabassum [2000] Crim LR 686, [2000] All ER (D) 649.74. Ibid. at paras 26–8.75. Law Commission, above n. 67 at para. 5.33.106 The Journal ......
Get Started for Free