R v Follett
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE |
| Judgment Date | 09 December 1988 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1988] EWCA Crim J1209-2 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Docket Number | No. 1602/B3/88 |
| Date | 09 December 1988 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
9 cases
- R v Jackson
-
R v Adam Umerji
...originally valid, has subsequently fallen away. This is illustrated by R v Thompson [1975] 1 WLR 1425 (as explained by Lord Lane CJ in R v Follett [1989] QB 338.) In Thompson the committal for trial was valid (see page 1427C.) However, the indictment preferred did not contain any of the c......
-
Bounds v R
... ... His Lordship described the concept of nullity as ‘more than a little elusive, not to say slippery’ ... 52 Joint reasons at [11] ... 53 (1991) 94 Cr App R 226 ... 54 (1984) 78 Cr App R 305 at 311. See also R v Newland [1988] QB 402 ; R v Follett [1989] QB 338 ... 55 (1992) Criminal Law Review 191 at 192 ... 56 [1997] 1 Cr App R 390 at 393–395 ... 57 [1997] 1 Cr App R 390 at 394–395 ... 58 474 US 438 (1986) ... 59 Kotteakos v United States 328 US 750 at 776 (1946) ... 60 ... ...
-
The Attorney General v Bowe
...committal proceedings upon which Information No. 241/7/93 was based to be spent ( R. v. Thompson and Clien (1975) 61 Cr. App. R. 108; R. v. Follett (1989) 88 Cr. App. R. 310; R. v. Desmond Rolle (Bahamas Supreme Court) Information No. 9314194; R. v. Carlton Ferguson (Bahamas Supreme Court) ......
Request a trial to view additional results