R v Garlick
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE |
| Judgment Date | 27 November 1980 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1980] EWCA Crim J1127-4 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Date | 27 November 1980 |
| Docket Number | No. 267/C/79 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
8 cases
-
DPP v Eadon
...for Northern Ireland[1963] A.C. 386, Broadhurst v. The Queen[1964] A.C. 441, Reg. v. Majewski[1977] A.C. 443, R. v. Garlick(1980) 72 Cr. App. R. 291, Reg. v. Sheehan[1975] 1 W.L.R. 739, The People (Director of Public Prosecutions) v. McBride[1996] 1 I.R. 312, R. v. Brown and Stratton[1998] ......
-
DPP v Davis
...v. O'Shea [1982] I.R. 384; [1983] I.L.R.M. 549. R. v. Challinor (1985) 80 Cr. App. R. 253; [1985] R.T.R. 373. R. v. Garlick (1980) 72 Cr. App. R. 291. R. v. Gent [1990] 1 All E.R. 364; (1989) 89 Cr. App. R. 247. R. v. Gordon (1991) 92 Cr. App. R. 50. R. v. Pardage [1975] Crim. L. Rev. 557. ......
-
DPP v Eadon
......While the English courts in R v Sheehan & Moore [1975] 2 All E.R. 960 , Broadhurst v. R. [1964] 1 All E.R. 11 , R v. Brown and Stratton [1998] Crim. L.R. 485 and R v. Garlick [1981] 72 Cr. App. R. 291 have held that the relevant question for the jury is whether the accused in fact formed a specific intent, and not whether the accused had capacity form such intent, the Irish authorities are unclear on the matter. The cases of The People (Attorney General) v. Manning ......
-
R v Simon Lee Hawkins
...Second, if he was, did he, in fact, form that intent? (See R. v Sheehan and Moore (1975), 60 Cr.App.R. 308 per Lord Lane LCJ, at 311; R v Garlick (1980), 72 Cr.App.R. 291 per Lord Lane at 294; and R v Horton, an unreported decision of this Court of 20th January 1992.) In Horton, McCullough ......
Request a trial to view additional results