R v Grant (James)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1936
Date1936
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
22 cases
  • New Tuck Shen v PP
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1981
  • DPP v Cawley
    • Ireland
    • Central Criminal Court (Ireland)
    • 14 June 2002
    ...18 Cox CC 5; 63 L.J.M.C. 133; 70 L.T. 879; 42 W.R. 511; 10 T.L.R. 431. R. v. Deery [1977] N.I. 164; [1977] C.L.R. 550. R. v. Grant [1936] 2 All E.R. 1156; 100 J.P. 324; 26 Cr. App. Rep. 8; 30 Cox CC 453; 80 Sol Jo 572; 106 L.J.K.B. 9; 155 L.T. 209; 52 T.L.R. 676; 34 L.G.R. 452. R. (O'Reilly......
  • R v Dudley Justices, ex parte Gillard
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 7 November 1985
    ...decision of the Divisional Court under appeal was that the court was bound by the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeal in Rex v. Grant [1936] 2 All E.R. 1156 to give judgment in the respondent's favour. In Grant's case the appellant had elected summary trial and pleaded guilty before a ......
  • R v Abdulla Ahmed Ali and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 19 May 2011
    ... ... Mr Lawrence J McNulty* and Mr O Osman for the Appellant (Savant) ... Mr James Wood QC and Mr M Summers for the Appellant (Zaman) ... Mr David Spens QC for the Applicant (Nabeel Hussain) ... 31 However, this court in two decisions in the 1930s, R v Sheridan [1937] 1 KB 223 and R v Grant [1936] 2 All ER 116 decided that the plea of autrefois convict could be relied on even if a defendant had not been sentenced. However in ... ...
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT