The Queen v Junior Bayode
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Judge | Lord Justice Hughes,and |
| Judgment Date | 26 March 2013 |
| Neutral Citation | [2013] EWCA Crim 356 |
| Docket Number | Case No: 201300651 |
| Date | 26 March 2013 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
6 cases
-
R v J (JF)
...but gave rise to a prosecution of an offence of greater gravity, in breach of the principle in Elrington. 25 Very recently in R v Bayode [2013] EWCA Crim 356, this court reached the same conclusion; Hughes LJ, at paragraph 17, set out the reasons for concluding that the scope of autrefois w......
-
James Robert Henderson v Crown Prosecution Service
...alternative' charges (see for example, R v. Bayode [2013] EWCA Crim 356 and Dyer). In the latter cases, to adopt the words of Hughes LJ in Bayode at [33], … whether there is one count or two, there cannot be convictions for both offences which are properly mutually exclusive alternatives. I......
-
Henry Dunn v R
...in R v Elrington (1861) 1 B & S 688 did not apply in this case either. That principle was explained by Hughes LJ in R v Bayode [2013] EWCA Crim 356, at paras. 22–23: “22. R v Elrington (1861) 1 B & S 688 has given its name to a principle which was only partly in issue in the case bu......
-
Itzaz Nafeez Akhtar v The Queen
...for possession of the petrol bombs with intent to damage property should not have been permitted pursuant to what he describes as the rule in Bayode. He also submits that there was a material misdirection in the first trial in that the jury should have had to find proved that the petrol bom......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Lesser Included Offences, Alternative Offences and Accessorial Liability
...since these conceptualisations of murder and manslaughter are now obsolete such an 24. Ibid. at 706F.25. Ibid. at 706G.26. In R v JB [2013] EWCA Crim. 356, Hughes LJ (as he then was) conflates lesser-included and lesser alternative offences. For a fuller discussion of lesser-included offenc......