R v Hamand

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeMR. JUSTICE BOREHAM
Judgment Date15 March 1985
Judgment citation (vLex)[1985] EWCA Crim J0315-3
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Date15 March 1985
Docket NumberNo. 5397/B3/84

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • R v Silverman
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 31 Marzo 1987
  • R v Keenan
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 26 Abril 1989
    ...1988, Transcript 398/F2/88); R. v. Hallett (March 1988, Transcript 2299/C3/88); R. v. Parris (November 1988, Transcript 4152/F2/88); R. v. Hammand (1986) 82 Cr. App. R. 65. We have endeavoured in what follows to give full weight to everything said in these cases. 40 Code C, in extension of ......
  • R v Sharp (Colin)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 16 Diciembre 1987
    ...the truth of the facts there related was contrary to the recent decisions of the Court of Appeal in Reg. v. Duncan, 73 Cr.App.R. 359 and Reg. v. Hamand (1985) 82 Cr.App.R. 12In Duncan, Lord Lane C.J. said, at p. 365: "Where a 'mixed' statement is under consideration by the jury in a case ......
  • Shalto v The State
    • Trinidad & Tobago
    • Court of Appeal (Trinidad and Tobago)
    • 22 Abril 1988
    ...election of the accused not to give evidence.” 34 (See also R v McGregor (1967) 51 Cr. App. R. 338; R v Pearce (1979) 69 Cr. App. R. 365; R v Hamand (1985) 82 Cr. App. R. 65). 35 In R v Sharp supra Lord Havers, with whose speech all the other Law Lords agreed, stated at p. 63 G to I: “The d......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT