R v Harwood
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1989 |
| Year | 1989 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
- R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Chinoy
-
R v Smurthwaite ; R v Gill
...defence of entrapment or agent provocateur, at others he contended that, in effect, section 78 afforded such a defence. 15 In Harwood (1989) Crim LR 285, the Court stated, albeit obiter, that section 78 has not abrogated the rule that neither entrapment nor agent provocateur afford a defenc......
-
R
...Appeal No. 34 of 1996 mentioned R v. Cristou [1992] QB 979 mentioned R v. Fedrick [1990] Crim. L.R. 403 considered R v. Harwood [1989] Crim. L.R. 285 considered R v Hulusi & Purvis (1973) 58 Cr App Rep 378 mentioned R v. Martinez-Tobon [1994] 2 All E.R. 90 applied R v. Matthews (198......
2 books & journal articles
-
Criminal Evidence and Computer Technology
...evidence under section 78 can be made after the evidence has been adduced in the proceedings – was disapproved of in R v Harwood [1989] Crim LR 285. The test to determine an application under section 78 of the PACE 1984 is whether, with regard to all the circumstances of the case (including......
-
Table of Cases
...394, (2002) 99(49) LSG 19 120 R v Harrison [2007] EWCA Crim 2976, [2008] 1 Cr App R 29, [2007] All ER (D) 72 (Dec) 149–150 R v Harwood [1989] Crim LR 285, [1988] Lexis Citation 1731, CA 224 R v Holloway (1982) 4 Cr App R (S) 128, [1982] Crim LR 467, (1982) 126 SJ 359, CA 162–163 R v Horncas......