R v Heyes (Percy)
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Year | 1950 |
Date | 1950 |
Court | Court of Criminal Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
21 cases
- R v Louise P
- Yau Heng Fang v Public Prosecutor, SC
- Leng Chow Teng; PP
-
The Queen v A2; The Queen v Magennis; The Queen v Vaziri
...(1928) 20 Cr App R 163 at 164; Wilde (1933) 24 Cr App R 98 at 99; Olivo (1942) 28 Cr App R 173 at 176; Field (1943) 29 Cr App R 151 at 153; R v Heyes [1951] 1 KB 29 at 30. See Cooke, “Venire de Novo” (1955) 71 Law Quarterly Review 100 at 118-120. 259 Friedland, “New Trial after an Appeal f......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
OKPARA V I G P
...of the High Court in England. There, a person once given in charge to a Jury can only be acquitted or convicted by the Jury: R. v. Heyes (1951) 1 K.B. 29; and the correct course would have been to di-15 rest the Jury, as a matter of law, that they must bring in a verdict of Not Guilty. The ......
-
THE QUEEN V. OLAGUNJU
...guilty. [As for summing up to jury, see 11 HALSBURY'S LAWS 4th Edition 172 Para 2971 30 CASE REFERRED TO IN JUDGMENT: 1. R. v. Heyes, 1951, 1 K.B. 29. Ogunsanya for Appellant. 35 Peter, Crown Counsel, for the Crown. BRETT, F.J. (Delivering the Judcjment of the Court): The appellant and anot......