R v Inner South London Coroner, ex parte Douglas-Williams

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
Judgment Date30 July 1998
Date30 July 1998

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
42 cases
  • R (Glaister & Carr) v Assistant Coroner N Wales E&C (Family of Ben Leonard)
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 30 January 2025
    ...“safety” as opposed to sufficiency of evidence – features in this case only in terms of the warning in R v Inner South London Coroner, ex p Douglas-Williams [1999] 1 All ER 344, 348–349 that “to leave all possible verdicts could in some situations merely confuse and overburden the jury” ( O......
  • Patrick George Baker v Police Appeals Tribunal
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 27 March 2013
    ...of the case which make it right to refuse the relief sought." In R v HM Coroner for Inner London South District, ex p Douglas-Williams [1999] 1 All ER 344 at 347, Lord Woolf said: "When it comes to exercising this discretion I cannot suggest a better test for a court to apply when deciding......
  • R (on the application of W, X, Y, and Z) v The Secretary of State for Health The Secretary of State for the Home Department (Interested Party)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 15 May 2014
    ...whether it should give [a remedy] than that it should be 'necessary or desirable to do so in the interests of justice'". ( R v Inner London South District Coroner, ex parte Douglas-Williams [1999] 1 All ER 344, 347). Applying that test, I do not think that it could be in the interests of ju......
  • R (Mulholland) v HM Coroner for St Pancras
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 7 November 2003
    ...from a fellow officer, but the court was not persuaded that the interests of justice called for a fresh inquest. 31 In R v Coroner ex parte Douglas-Williams [1999] 1 All E R 344 the deceased died in custody. The jury returned a verdict of accidental death. It was contended in the Court of A......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • 10 Tips To Remember When Doing An Inquest
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 25 October 2002
    ...the hearing For example: - R v Humberside Coroner ex p Jamieson [1995] QB 1, R v Coroner for Inner London South ex p Douglas-Williams [1999] 1 All ER 344, , R (Wright) v Secretary of State (2001) 62 BMLR 16, R (application Touche) v Inner North London Coroner [2001] QB 1206, R v Adomako [19......
1 books & journal articles
  • Exemplum Habemus: Reflections on the Judicial Studies Board's Specimen Directions
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 70-1, February 2006
    • 1 February 2006
    ...eliminate a lot of needless diff‌iculties in future. We do not, however,184 [1997] QB 1.185 [1998] EWHC Admin 744 at [100–101].186 [1999] 1 All ER 344: ‘In future coroners faced with a complex case of this sortwould be wise to prepare, in advance of their summing up, a written statement oft......