R v Johnson and Others
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Neutral Citation | [2006] EWCA Crim 2486 |
| Date | 2006 |
| Year | 2006 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
32 cases
-
R v Dean Pedley and Others
...see section 229 and Considine and Davis [2007] EWCA Crim 1166; [2008] 1 Cr App R (S) 41. The focus is, as explained in Johnson [2006] EWCA Crim 2486; [2007] 1 Cr App R (S) 112, not principally upon the facts of the instant case but upon future 17 All the parties before us agreed that in a......
-
R v Michael Edwin Reynolds
... ... The provisions of Chapter 5 of the 2003 Act have now being extensively reviewed and explained in R v Lang [2006] 2 Cr App R(S) 3 and R v Johnson [2006] EWCA Crim 2486 ... They provide a mandatory sentencing framework for all offenders convicted of a “specified” offence committed on or after ... She had been the victim of abuse, some of it sexual, since the age of four at the hands of others. The appellant was a 33 year old man with an extensive criminal record, though without previous convictions for sexual offences. On the 20 th June ... ...
-
R (on the application of Sturnham) v The Parole Board of England and Wales and another (No. 2)
...of other cases, the predictive approach appears to have been assumed to be correct in relation to the imposition of a sentence of IPP. In R v Johnson [2006] EWCA Crim 2486, [2007] 1 WLR 585, Sir Igor Judge P said (para 10) that "It does not automatically follow from the absence of actual ......
-
R v Raymon Stannard and Others
... ... But this may not be possible if the later offences are less serious than the earlier ones”. As we shall see, this observation provides a very flimsy basis for the practice described to us by counsel ... 4 In R v Johnson and others [2006] EWCA Crim 2486 judges and practitioners were reminded that Rose LJ himself emphasised that the observations in Lang should not be treated as a substitute for the provisions of the Act, and accordingly some areas of “potential misunderstanding arising from Lang” were ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results