R v Raymon Stannard and Others
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | The Lord Chief Justice |
| Judgment Date | 26 November 2008 |
| Neutral Citation | [2008] EWCA Crim 2789 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Date | 26 November 2008 |
| Docket Number | Case No: 2007/04087/A8 (1) 2007/05439/A6(3) |
To continue reading
Request your trial
7 cases
-
Reference by the Criminal Cases Review Commission and Another (Respondent) Rahuel Delucca (Appellants) on Appeal From the Crown Court at Birmingham, HHJ Judge Inman and Another (Respondent) Graham Murray (Appellants) on Appeal From the Crown Court at Stafford, the Hon Mrs Justice Macur and Another (Respondent) Christopher Stubbings (Appellants)
...the dangerousness of an offender, the court was entitled to have regard to matters occurring before April 2005: see Stannard [2008] EWCA Crim 2789. As the court is imposing punishment for all the offences before it, it must follow that the court must have regard to all the offences includi......
-
R v George C
...authority on sentencing in historic cases is H and others [2011] EWCA Crim. 2753 in which the principles are set out. In Stannard [2008] EWCA Crim. 2789 the Lord Chief Justice explained the principle of overall criminality, explaining the earlier case of Lang as follows: "3. We were told in......
-
R v A (Matthew Keith)
...age the dangerousness provisions did not apply. However, he was entitled to have regard to the decision of this court in R v Stannard [2008] EWCA Crim 2789, which permitted the court to take into account the overall position, which would include the appellant's offending in count 1. He came......
-
R v Souter
...of the Court of Appeal in R. v. H [2011] EWCA Crim 2753 and also the decision of the Court of Appeal in R. v. Stannard & Others [2008] EWCA Crim 2789. Mr Hill has also brought to my attention the case of R. v. N from the court of Appeal on 13th November 33. Counts 1 to 19 represent conduct ......
Request a trial to view additional results