R v Jones, Planter and Pengelly
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1991 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 cases
-
R v Jones
...subjects for custodial restraint pending trial. Be that as it may, the issue fell to be decided in R v Jones, Planter and Pengelly [1991] CrimLR 856. In that case three defendants stood trial charged with a number of offences, but after some days two of the defendants, who were on bail, abs......
-
R v Hayward, R v Jones (Anthony), R v Purvis
...discretion is to be used sparingly and never if the accused's defence could be prejudiced by his absence. In Jones, Planter and Pengelly 1991 Crim LR 856, CACD transcript 14th June 1991, the Court of Appeal, presided over by Lord Lane, Chief Justice, held that it is plain in principle and h......
-
R v Chute (No 4)
...to go on with the trial in the absence of the defendant. ( Ebatarinja v Deland (1998) 194 CLR 444 at 454; Jones, Planter and Pengelly [1991] Crim LR 856; R v King (2004) 155 ACTR 55; R v Collie (2005) 91 SASR 339 at [33]; Hellenic Republic v Tzatzimakis (2003) 127 FCR 130 at [89]; R v Fergu......
-
Tan Seet Eng v Attorney-General and another matter
...even if he is not giving evidence (see, eg, ss 230, 298 and 387 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68, 2012 Rev Ed) and also R v Jones [1991] Crim LR 856 at [24] where the English Court of Appeal referred to the accused’s right to be present at his trial and put forward his defence), while......
Request a trial to view additional results