R v Joseph Smith
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judge | Lord Justice Pitchford |
Judgment Date | 15 January 2013 |
Neutral Citation | [2013] EWCA Crim 11 |
Date | 15 January 2013 |
Docket Number | No: 2012/7227/D2 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
To continue reading
Request your trial6 cases
-
R Augustine Ogunsola v Crown Court at Aylesbury
...of a verdict of guilty to a summary only offence which is a true alternative verdict to an indictable offence: see R v Smith [2013] 2 Cr App R. 5 at [22], [31], [33]. This section too is inapplicable to the present case since an offence of harassment is not an alternative to either of the ......
-
Gerald Quinn v The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs, TC 07056
...has been released or provided by the Tribunal to the parties. The President of the First-tier Tribunal 1 [2014] UKFTT 782 (TC) 2 2013 EWCA Crim 11 51, 8 (Tax Chamber) instructed that the appeal be relisted for a new hearing before a new panel. This hearing is precisely that. Possible late a......
-
R v Paul William Grady
...victims and in their failure to take heed of the court's warnings to them in the past. 13 We remind ourselves that in R v Andrews [2013] 2 Cr App R 5, this court indicated that in a case such as this the statutory minimum sentence is not to be treated as a starting point. The proper approac......
-
R v Michael Mark Darnley
...Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000. 15 In R v Paul William Grady [2013] EWCA Crim 702, reference was made to R v Andrews [2013] 2 Cr App R 5, that the minimum term is not to be taken as the starting point. The court said: i. “13. … The proper approach is that the court should......
Request a trial to view additional results