R v Kensington Income Tax Commissioners. ex parte de Polignac (Princess)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1917
Date1917
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
449 cases
  • Multi-Code Electronics Industries (M) Bhd and Another v Toh Chun Toh Gordon and Others
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 3 November 2008
    ...in the case. 125 Counsel for the 3rd defendant cited Kensington Income Tax Commissioners, Ex-parte Princess Edmond de Polignac [1917] 1 KB 486 where Warrington LJ stated It is perfectly settled that a person who make an ex parte application to the court - that is to say, in the absence of t......
  • Dynacast (S) Pte Ltd v Lim Meng Siang and Another
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 25 August 1989
    ...the part of the plaintiffs and following the decision of the Court of Appeal in R v General Commissioners of Income Tax for Kensington [1917] 1 KB 486, the interim order should be discharged without going into the merits. Counsel also cited to me Thermax v Schott Industrial Glass [1981] FSR......
  • Bahtera Offshore (M) Sdn Bhd v Sim Kok Beng
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 3 August 2009
    ...v The General Commissioners for the Purposes of the Income Tax Acts for the District of Kensington;Ex parte Princess Edmond de Polignac [1917] 1 KB 486 (folld) Lee Hung Khoon v Yeo Tang Mui [1990] 1 SLR (R) 459; [1990] SLR 509 (refd) Lloyds Bowmaker Ltd v Britannia Arrow Holdings Plc [1988]......
  • Gian Singh & Company v The Bank of China Ltd
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1948
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Litigation
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume III - Third Edition
    • 13 April 2020
    ...See paragraph 26.259f. 638 See, eg, Chaimandos v Sydney Water Corporation [2014] NSWSC 10. 639 R v Kensington Income Tax Commissioners [1917] 1 KB 486 at 513–514, per Scrutton LJ; Brink’s Mat v Elcombe [1988] 1 WLR 1350; Wessex RHA v John Laing Construction Ltd (1994) 39 Con LR 56 at 69, pe......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Understanding Section 8: Search, Seizure, and the Canadian Constitution
    • 17 June 2005
    ...Johnson (1989), 88 Cr. App. R. 131 (C.A.)..........................................175 R. v. Kensington Income Tax Commissioners, [1917] 1 K.B. 486 ..................207, 312 R. v. Kesselring (2000), 132 O.A.C. 41, 145 C.C.C. (3d) 119 (C.A.) ........................ 209 R. v. Khuc, [2000] B......
  • Ireland: The Celtic Tiger Bites — The Attack on the Proceeds of Crime
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Money Laundering Control No. 4-3, January 2001
    • 1 January 2001
    ...ref. 22 above, at p. 243. (48) This is similar to English law: see R v Kensington Income Tax Commissioners ex parte Princess de Polignac [1917] 1 KB 486. (49) In practice this will be the case as the Criminal Assets Bureau have internal guidelines for proceeding under the Proceeds of Crime ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT