R v Lobell
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Year | 1957 |
Date | 1957 |
Court | Court of Criminal Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
80 cases
- R v Newcastle-upon-Tyne Justices, ex parte Hindle
- Looi Wooi Saik v Public Prosecutor
-
R. v. Cinous (J.), (2002) 285 N.R. 1 (SCC)
...1 (H.L.), refd to. [para. 145]. Holmes v. Director of Public Prosecutions, [1946] A.C. 588 (H.L.), refd to. [para. 145]. R. v. Lobell, [1957] 1 Q.B. 547 (C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 146]. R. v. Latour, [1951] S.C.R. 19, refd to. [para. 147]. R. v. Proudlock, [1979] 1 S.C.R. 525; 24 N.R. 199, r......
-
Ashley v Chief Constable of Sussex Police
...to the person and battery is an example of a trespass to the person. So too does Goddard LJ in Dumbell v Roberts at page 331 and in R v Lobell [1957] 1 QB 547. 23 The proposition that in tort the burden of proving self-defence, including the allegation that the force used was reasonable, is......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 books & journal articles
-
Preliminary Sections
...(1961) All N L R 25 15 R. v. Walton and Ogden (1863) 9 Cox C.C. 268; (C.C.C.R.) 83 Reg. v. Rivetts, 34 Cr. App. R.87, 94. 146 R. Lobell (1957) 1 Q.B. 547, 551. 288 Reed v. Cattermole (1937) 1 K.B. (C.A.) 613; (1936) 2 K.B. 645; (1937) All E R 541 46 Reeves v. Deane-Freeman (1953) 1 Q.B.D. 4......
-
Four Threats to the Presumption of Innocence
...vehicle, which carries a possible prisonsentence.75 Above n. 12.76 See decisions such as RvMancini [1942] AC 1 (provocation), RvLobell [1957] 1 QB 547 (self-defence),and RvGill [1963] 1 WLR 841 (duress).77 See T. H. Jones, ‘Insanity, Automatism, and the Burden of Proof on the Accused’ (1995......
-
A Different Ball Game—Why the Nature of Consent in Contact Sports Undermines a Unitary Approach
...(A. Lewis andJ. Taylor, Sport: Law and Practice (Butterworths: London, 2003) 1081–2).28 Mancini v DPP [1942] AC 1.29 Rv Lobell [1957] 1 QB 547.30 As held in Woolmingtonv DPP [1935] AC 462, the burden of proving everyelement of a criminal offence falls on the prosecution, absent the presumpt......
-
Defenceless Castles
...particular discussion. 4. Its relevance can, of course, be questioned in practice as a result of the decision in R v Duffy [1967] 1 QB 63 (CCA), in which, despite the enactment of the 1967 Act, the courts continued to talk in terms of the common law rules. 5. Criminal Justice and Immigratio......
Request a trial to view additional results