R v Lowe ; R v Leask

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeTHE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE
Judgment Date12 February 1999
Neutral Citation[1999] EWCA Crim J0212-51
Judgment citation (vLex)[1999] EWCA Crim J0212-30
Docket NumberNo. 98/7392/Z5
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Date12 February 1999

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
9 cases
  • R (Webb) v Secretary of State for Justice
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 24 June 2010
    ...me to point against Mr Strachan's first contention that the order for return was in respect of the burglary. 20 The third case is R v Lowe [2000] 1 WLR 153. By the stage that section 40 came to be considered by the Court of Appeal in Lowe, a statutory change had occurred. Section 102 of the......
  • R Webb v Secretary of State for Justice
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 8 September 2010
    ...consequence of a wholly fresh sentencing exercise, an exercise which is not carried out “in respect” of the original offence. 21 In R v Lowe [2000] 1 WLR 153, Lord Bingham revisited his earlier judgment in Varney and in summary emphasised that his comments in that case were not intended to ......
  • R (Webb) v Secretary of State for Justice
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 8 September 2010
  • R v Costello
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • Invalid date
    ...R v Gordon [2007] EWCA Crim 165; [2007] 1 WLR 2117; [2007] 2 All ER 768; [2007] 2 Cr App R (S) 400, CA R v Lowe [2000] 1 WLR 153; [1999] 3 All ER 762; [1999] 2 Cr App R (S) 316, R v O’Brien [2006] EWCA Crim 1741; [2007] 1 WLR 833; [2006] 4 All ER 1012; [2007] 1 Cr App R (S) 442, CA APPEAL a......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT