R v Lowe ; R v Leask
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE |
| Judgment Date | 12 February 1999 |
| Neutral Citation | [1999] EWCA Crim J0212-51 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1999] EWCA Crim J0212-30 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Date | 12 February 1999 |
| Docket Number | No. 98/7392/Z5 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
8 cases
-
R Webb v Secretary of State for Justice
...as a consequence of a wholly fresh sentencing exercise, an exercise which is not carried out “in respect” of the original offence. 21 In R v Lowe [2000] 1 WLR 153, Lord Bingham revisited his earlier judgment in Varney and in summary emphasised that his comments in that case were not intende......
-
R (Webb) v Secretary of State for Justice
...seems to me to point against Mr Strachan's first contention that the order for return was in respect of the burglary. 20 The third case is R v Lowe [2000] 1 WLR 153. By the stage that section 40 came to be considered by the Court of Appeal in Lowe, a statutory change had occurred. Section 1......
- R (Webb) v Secretary of State for Justice
-
Paul Elvis F. and Matthew John S
...It was argued in reliance on R v Foran that the total term had been exceeded. Counsel for the appellants submitted, in reliance on R v Lowe and R v Leask [1999] 3 All ER 762, [1999] Crim LR 423, that the period for which the appellants were ordered to be returned to custody under section 40......
Request a trial to view additional results