R v Maher
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | LORD JUSTICE O'CONNOR |
| Judgment Date | 15 February 1983 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1983] EWCA Crim J0215-7 |
| Docket Number | No. 4290/R/81 No. 3721/R/81 No. 3449/R/81 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Date | 15 February 1983 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
Caffrey's (Kieran) Application
...however, that in the context of the 1968 Act the meaning was confined to the legal fees, relying on the earlier decision of R v Maher [1983] 2 All ER 417, decided under section 4 of the Costs in Criminal Cases Act 1973, which he submitted was more akin to section 2(1) of the 1968 Act than t......
-
Blows v Herefordshire District Council
...to Archbold 2009 edition, paragraph 6-29 which reads: “Orders for costs should not be made which are beyond the means of the defendant: R v Maher [1983] QB 784, 76 Cr.App.R 309, CA; R v Mountain, 68 Cr.App.R 41, CA; R v Nottingham JJ, ex p Fohmann, 84 Cr.App.R 316, DC (wrong in principle t......
-
R v Melanie Shurn
...principle that orders for costs should not be made beyond the means of a defendant to pay within a reasonable time — see for example R v Maher (1983) QB 784 and the cases collected in Archbold at paragraph 6–29. The correct approach is now summarised in Practice Direction (Costs in Criminal......
-
Barr v New Zealand
...the widest possible discretion to the Courts”.22 Seventhly, a successful defendant may recover under 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 At p 100. [1983] 1 QB 784. Section Definition of “costs” in s 2. Section 449. Section 402(1). (1967) 354 NZPD 4140. s 5(1) such sum as the Court thinks just and reasonab......