R v Mark Boutell and Another
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judge | LORD JUSTICE THOMAS |
Judgment Date | 19 August 2010 |
Neutral Citation | [2010] EWCA Crim 2054 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
Date | 19 August 2010 |
Docket Number | No. 2010/04069/A9 & 2010/03631/A6 |
To continue reading
Request your trial7 cases
-
Desmond Shields-McKinley v The Secretary of State for Justice the Lord Chancellor
...A suggested formulation was put forward. In Nnail and Johnson [2009] EWCA Crim 468 this court further refined that formulation: see also R v Boutell [2010] EWCA Crim 2054… 5. It has always been the duty of defence advocates to ensure that proper information about their client relevant to ......
-
R v Mark Leacock and Others
...was put forward. In Nnaji and Johnson [2009] EWCA Crim 468 this Court further refined that formulation; see also R v Boutell [2010] EWCA Crim 2054. 4 The position was made more complex when the provisions were amended by s.21(1) and (4) of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 which......
-
R v Shaun Nigel Taylor
...this case underscores the importance of a defence advocate's duty, emphatically stressed by this court in R v Boutell and Ricketts [2010] EWCA Crim 2054 at [21], to advise the court of its obligations and, after due enquiry, of the number of days an offender has spent on remand and on quali......
-
R v Daniel Herrity and Another
...those periods that have been spent in custody by the defendants will count towards their release date." 26 This court in R v Boutell [2010] EWCA (Crim) 2054 this court made clear at paragraph 16 that where a judge uses words that refer to "remand in custody", that is sufficient to enable pr......
Request a trial to view additional results