R v Miller (Peter)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Assizes |
| Date | 1954 |
| Year | 1954 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
38 cases
-
PGA v The Queen
...will know that he was a judge of the highest repute. As a criminal lawyer, there were not many to excel him in his day.’ In R v Miller [1954] 2 QB 282 at 289 Lynskey J concurred with R v Clarke. 152 R v O'Brien [1974] 3 All ER 663. 153 R v Steele (1976) 65 Cr App R 22. 154 R v Steele (1......
- R v L
-
R v Barry C
...sexual intercourse would fall within the shadow of the protection that a wife has against prosecution for rape … of his wife". In R v Miller [1954] 2 QB 282 it was held that a husband who had forcible sexual intercourse with his wife after she had presented a petition for divorce could not ......
-
R v R [1991]
...was revoked. Thus, in my opinion, the husband was not entitled to have intercourse with her without her consent." 16 In Reg. v. Miller [1954] 2 Q.B. 282 the husband was charged with rape of his wife after she had left him and filed a petition for divorce. He was also charged with assault up......
Get Started for Free
12 books & journal articles
-
Offences against the Person: Into the 21st Century
...or an assault and on Stephen J’s view therewas a battery, a touching.) If this law were modern law, then s. 20 would21 R v Miller [1954] 2 QB 282 at 292. See, e.g., R (on the application of T) v DPP [2003]EWHC 266 (Admin): momentary loss of consciousness—‘an injurious impairmentto the victi......
-
Exorcism, Religious Freedom and Consent
...mean harm which is more than transient or trifling, but need not bepermanent:RvDonovan [1934] 2 KB 498, 25 Cr App Rep 1, CCA; RvMiller [1954] 2 QB 282; RvChan Fook [1994] 2 AllER 552. Psychological harm is included, but only where identifiable psychiatric injury can be demonstrated: RvDhali......
-
Divisional Court
...the word‘bodily’ restricts this offence to the causing of physical as opposed topsychological or psychiatric injuries. In R v Miller [1954] 2 QB 282,where a husband forced his wife to have sexual intercourse, it was heldthat actual bodily harm was not limited to skin, flesh or bones, butin......
-
Not Giving Up the Fight
...Smith [1961] AC 290 at 334.26. Dica [2004] QB 1257 at 1257.27. Taylor [2009] EWCA Crim 544.28. Donovan [1934] 2 KB 298 at 509.29. Miller [1954] 2 QB 282 at 285.30. Roberts (1971) 56 Cr App R 95.31. Above n. 2 at para 1.8.32. Ibid. at paras 1.8–1.9.33. Ibid. at para 5.106.34. Ibid. at para 5......
Get Started for Free