R v Mushtaq (Ashfaq Ahmed)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | Lord Justice Kay |
| Judgment Date | 30 July 2002 |
| Neutral Citation | [2002] EWCA Crim 1943 |
| Docket Number | Case No: 200102468 X5 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Date | 30 July 2002 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
7 cases
-
R v Mushtaq (Ashfaq Ahmed)
...Lord Hutton Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers Lord Rodger of Earlsferry Lord Carswell HOUSE OF LORDS SESSION 2004-05 on appeal from: [2002] EWCA Crim 1943 OPINIONS OF THE LORDS OF APPEAL FOR JUDGMENT IN THE CAUSE LORD STEYN My Lords, 1 I have read the opinion of my noble and learned friend L......
-
Amogan et Al v The State
... ... 2, placing strong reliance on the cases of R v. Mushtaq [2005] 1 W.L.R. 1513 , Simmons and Anor v. R [2006] U.K.P.C. 19 and Williams v. The Queen ... ...
-
Lewis v R
... ... Lord Hutton, giving the decision in R. v. Mushtaq [2005] 1 WLR 1513 HL , at para. 22, the facts of which are not material, approved the following ... ...
-
Foster and Williams v The Queen
...appeal that the judge ought to have directed the jury on the lines laid down by the House of Lords in R v. Mushtaq [2005] UKHL 25, [2005] 1 WLR 1513. In Foster's case he argued that the judge should have given a direction that if the jury found that the appellant was or may have been reckl......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Exemplum Habemus: Reflections on the Judicial Studies Board's Specimen Directions
...not stated to be principles of law asopposed to matters of evidence, and it would be unfortunate if they crystallised assuch’).108 [2002] EWCA Crim 1943.109 [1968] 2 QB 112 esp. at 117.110 JSB Specimen Direction No. 25.2. The transcript in fact gives a slightly differentversion, substitutin......