R v Owen (Charles)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
JudgeLORD JUSTICE STOCKER
Judgment Date09 October 1987
Judgment citation (vLex)[1987] EWCA Crim J1009-4
Docket Number1275/G2/87
Date09 October 1987

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
2 cases
  • Babanaft International Company S.A. v Bassatne
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 29 June 1988
    ...v. Galani (1987) 3 W.L.R. 1042. Leave to appeal against that decision was refused by the Appeal Committee of the House of Lords: (1988) 1 W.L.R. 134. It is further clear that an order for extra-territorial disclosure can be made pursuant to section 37(1) of the Supreme Court Act 1981 in a c......
  • R v Graham-Kerr
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 28 June 1988
    ...be entitled to adduce evidence of motive". 15 Before the case resumed the learned Judge added that he had seen a decision of this court in R. v. Owen, (The Times Law Report, October 10 1987), of which we also have a transcript. 16 Evidence was then called. The stage was reached when the evi......
2 books & journal articles
  • Child Pornography: Balancing Substantive and Evidential Law to Safeguard Children Effectively from Abuse
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 9-1, January 2005
    • 1 January 2005
    ...but computer technology, particularly the Internet, has led to an38 [1988] 1 Cr App R 301.39 Ibid. at 305, per Judge LJ.40 R v Owen (1986) 86 Cr App R 291.41 See J. C. Smith commenting on R v Owen [1988] Crim LR 120.42 [2004] EWCA Crim 2211, [2004] All ER (D) 556 (Jul) (see above n. 20 and ......
  • Possession of Prohibited Images of Children: Three Years on
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 77-4, August 2013
    • 1 August 2013
    ...Tinkering with “childpornography”’ [2004] Crim LR 361 for a discussion about whether this change isdesirable or necessary.13 R v Owen (1988) 86 Cr App R 291 at 296, per Stocker LJ.14 PCA 1978, s. 2(3).15 R vLand [1998] 1 Cr App R 301.The Journal of Criminal Whether a photograph is indecent ......