R v Prince
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1865 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
51 cases
-
C v Ireland
...to be found in a line of authorities running from 112 R. v. Forbes 113 (1865) 10 Cox C .C. 362, and including 114 R. v. Prince 115 (1875) L.R. 2 C.C.R. 154 ; 116 R. v. Maxwell 117 (1909) 2 Cr. App. R. 26 ; 118 R. v. Mark 119 [1961] Crim. L.R. 173 ; Kenlin v. Gardiner [1967] 2 Q.B. 510; 120 ......
-
R v Brown (Raymond Andrew)
...knowledge or belief as to whether she is already a prostitute is irrelevant. 15 He draws our attention in this respect to the authority of R. v. Prince (1875) 2 Crown Cases Reserved 154. It was a case, so far as one can make out, that was heard before all the Judges. That was a charge of un......
-
R v Tegerdine
...conclusion. Because of this conflict of judicial opinion the full Court for the Consideration of Crown Cases Reserved assembled in Reg. v. Prince, L.R. 2 C.C.R. 154. It is interesting to note that the presiding judge was Cockburn C.J., whose decision in Tinkler's case gave rise to the conf......
-
R v Austin
...for the use of violence in such a circumstance. 18 In considering the meaning of the word "unlawfully" assistance can be derived from The Queen v. Prince, Vol. II C.C.R. (1872-1875). In this case there had been a conviction under s. 55 of the Act of unlawfully taking an unmarried girl under......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Strict Criminal Liability: A Violation of the Convention?
...ER 963, CA.21 International Transport Roth GmbH and Others v Secretary of State for the HomeDepartment [2003] QB 728, CA.22 R vPrince (1875) LR 2 CCR 154. cf. B (A Minor) vDPP [2000] 2 AC 428, HL andR vK [2001] 3 All ER 897.The Journal of Criminal regularly,23 and inflation24. The categori......
-
Conspiracy: Mens Rea
...part of the elements for the full offence.This proposition can be exemplified by two examples. First, consider thefacts in R v Prince (1875) LR 2 CCR 154, involving the offence ofabduction of a minor (a strict liability crime), but where D legitimatelybelieved the girl to be over 16. Suppos......
-
Taking and Driving Away Motor Vehicles, and Mens Rea
...offences which are personal intheir nature and are not inthesame class as regards the pro-tection of public welfare, viz. R. v. Prince,L.R.2C.C.R. 154(abduction), R. v. Wheat (1921) 2K.B.II9(bigamy) and R. v.Leinster (Duke01)(1924) IK.B.3II(undischarged bankruptobtaining credit).However, th......