R v Rose
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 22 December 1993 |
| Date | 22 December 1993 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 cases
-
R v Dameed Umer Khan and Others
...are in conflict with other authorities in which the Court has simply substituted its own view for that of the trial judge. He referred to R. v. Kane (1977) 65 Cr App R 270, R v. Cooper (1979) 69 Cr App R 229 and R v. McCann (1991) 92 Cr App R 239. 66 Mr Suckling, on behalf of the respondent......
-
R v Terence James Frazier Silcock, David Levin
... ... [2004] EWCA Crim 408 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL CRIMINAL DIVISION Royal Courts of Justice Strand London, WC2 ... The Vice President ... (Lord Justice Rose) ... Mr Justice Poole ... Mr Justice Davis ... No: 200205168/A8-200301022/A8-200302050/A8 Regina and Terence James Fraxier Silcock David Levin ... MR N FOOKS appeared on behalf of the APPELLANT SILCOCK ... MR FORTSON appeared ... ...
-
Paul John Clark and John Preston ; Bentham
...as a correct statement of the law. The Act has also been considered in later authority, in particular R v Redbourne (1993) 96 Cr App R 201, R v Rose (1993) 97 Cr App R 253 and R v Khan (CA 26.2.96, unreported). Those decisions relieve us of the need to recite the terms of the Act or to atte......
-
Alexander Bain Donnelly And Alison Donnelly V. Her Majesty's Advocate
...is simply stated without any further reasoning or comment. The approach taken in R. v. Redbourne was carried forward in R. v. Rose [1993] 2 All E.R. 761 and commented on in R. v. Khan supra, although we think it evident that the court in the latter case had some difficulty with the addition......
Request a trial to view additional results