R v Rose
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 22 December 1993 |
| Date | 22 December 1993 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
11 cases
-
R v Dameed Umer Khan and Others
...App R 84, at 90-92, and by the House of Lords in R v. Aziz & Ors [1995] 3 WLR 53, at 62, should have been given. He referred also to R v. Russell, CA, 17.10.95 (unreported), where, in circumstances clearly indicating some form of criminal activity during the period of the alleged drug-t......
-
Paul John Clark and John Preston ; Bentham
...us back to our own analysis of section 2(2) and (3) and Lord Lane CJ's judgment in Dickens and the contrary stance of this court in Redbourne, Rose and Chapman. It also leaves one still unanswered question. As Parliament gave the courts a discretion whether to make the assumptions in each c......
-
R v Terence James Frazier Silcock, David Levin
...must adduce admissible evidence, if they wished to rely on any of the contents of the prosecution statement. 38In the case of R v Rose (1993) 97 Cr App R 253, he submits that there are words of Alliott J that support that view. He quotes them: "We agree that if admissible evidence satisfies......
-
R v Kenneth Ivanhoe Simms
...Scoka submitted that the decision in Redbourne's case must be viewed in the light of what was said about it in the later case of Rose (1993) 97 Cr App R 253. 39 But what was said in Rose related to a different part of the judgment in Redbourne's case, and in any event we venture to question......
Get Started for Free