R v Rowley
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Judgment Date | 04 July 1991 |
| Date | 04 July 1991 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
10 cases
- Mohd Farid bin Mohd Sukis and Another; PP
-
R v Simon Austin Hamilton
...was in fact outraged; Taylor LJ, as he then was, had referred to the outrage to the member of the public in the passage we have cited from Rowley at paragraph 25.ii) above; public decency could not be outraged unless the nature of the act was seen by 36 However in our view the purpose of th......
-
Paul Charles Andrews v The Chief Constable of Suffolk Constabulary
...more than merely preparatory to the commission of the offence, he is guilty of attempting to commit the offence.’ 12 Ms Morris relies upon R v Rowley [1991] 1 WLR 1020, CA and R v Geddes (1996) 160 JP 697, CA (to both of which the lower court had been referred) and upon R v MS [2021] EWCA C......
-
Rowe v R
...law. 29 41 Similar concerns about the undue extension of the concept of an indecent act underlie the decision of the Court of Appeal in R v S. 30 The appellant in R v S appealed to the Court of Appeal against conviction on two charges relating to the 12 year old daughter of his partner. Rel......
Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
-
Subject Index, Volume 77, 2004
...October 2004, CA (Crim) 334–339R v Pollock, September 2004, CA (Northern Ireland) 272–276R v Preddy (1996) AC 815 76, 77R v Rowley [1991] 1 WLR 1020 242R v Secretary of State, ex p. Northumbria Police Authority [1988] 2WLR 590 142R v Sed, May 2004, CA (Crim) 327–331R v Shayler (2001) 1 WLR ......
-
Tackling Grooming
...there would be sufficient proximity between the actand the result, rendering it almost certainly merely preparatory(see R v Rowley [1991] 1 WLR 1020 and R v Geddes [1996]Crim LR 895; for a fuller discussion of these issues seeGillespie, 2002: 413–15).In essence this led to the situation wh......
-
Recent Judicial Decisions
...above offence,even though the defendant's ultimate motive in meeting the boys was to commit acts ofgross indecency with them: RvRowley [1991] 4 All ER 649.The facts were, Rowley left notes in public places over a period of three weeksoffering money and presents to boys. The Crown alleged th......
