R v Selina Elizabeth Martin
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | SIR IGOR JUDGE |
| Judgment Date | 05 April 2006 |
| Neutral Citation | [2006] EWCA Crim 1035 |
| Docket Number | No: 200504967 A2 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Date | 05 April 2006 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
6 cases
-
Gemmell, Robertson, Gibson and McCourt v HM Advocate
...626; 52 Cr App R 21; [1967] Crim LR 714; 112 SJ 189 R v LMUNK 2008 SCC 31; [2008] 2 SCR 163 R v MUNK [1996] 1 SCR 500 R v MartinUNK [2006] EWCA Crim 1035; [2007] 1 Cr App R (S) 3 R v Millberry; R v Lackenby; R v MorganUNKWLRUNKUNKUNK [2002] EWCA Crim 2891; [2003] 1 WLR 546; [2003] 2 All ER ......
-
R v Gavin Goodale
...judgment and then applying what he or she considers is the appropriate reduction for a guilty plea. It is the bottom line that matters. In R v Martin [2006] EWCA Crim. 1035, Sir Igor Judge, President of the Queen's Bench Division (as he then was), said at paragraph 2: "The sentencing decisi......
-
Attorney General's Reference (No. 14 of 2008); R v John Henry Cook
...our attention to the statement of this court given by the President of the Queen's Bench Division (Sir Igor Judge) in R v Martin [2006] EWCA Crim 1035 in which he said: “2. The sentencing decision does not represent a mathematical exercise, nor does it result from an arithmetical calculatio......
-
Dane Dameon McPherson v HM the Queen
...mercy”. For this formulation, Ms. Fosuhene referred us to the following statement of the court given by Sir Igor Judge in R v Martin [2006] EWCA Crim 1035, para 2. “The sentencing decision does not represent a mathematical exercise, nor does it result from an arithmetical calculation. The ......
Request a trial to view additional results