R v Thomas

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeLord Justice Richards
Judgment Date25 May 2011
Neutral Citation[2011] EWCA Crim 1295
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Date25 May 2011
Docket NumberCase No: 201004692 B1

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
  • I R v Kuba Dlugosz
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 30 January 2013
    ...assessment of whether there is a sufficiently reliable scientific basis for such an evaluative opinion to be given. (g) The decision in R v Ashley Thomas 15 The Crown contended that it was not open to us to consider whether there was a sufficiently reliable scientific basis, as this court h......
  • R v Ashley Kieron Thomas
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 17 January 2014
    ...protection (see, e.g., R v Johnson and Others [2006] EWCA Crim 2486; [2007] 1 Cr App R (S) 112 at [3] and R v C [2008] EWCA Crim 2790[2011] EWCA Crim 1295). He did not at that stage appeal against sentence. 4 However, an appeal against sentence out-of-time is now brought with the leave of t......
  • Ingraham v R
    • Bahamas
    • Court of Appeal (Bahamas)
    • 27 July 2017
    ...S.W. 3d 656 (Tex. App. 2006) considered Michael Pringle v the Queen, (Privy Council Appeal 17 of 2002) considered R v Ashley Thomas [2011] EWCA Crim 1295 considered R v Bates [2006] EWCA Crim. 1395 considered R v Doheny ; R v Adams [1997] 1 Cr. App R 369 considered Regina v Kuba Dlugo......
2 books & journal articles
  • Explaining and trusting expert evidence: What is a ‘sufficiently reliable scientific basis’?
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 24-3, July 2020
    • 1 July 2020
    ...system by which experts monitor one76. Dlugosz, above n. 72 at [21(iii)].77. For a similar point see Gill (2014: loc 3210).78. [2011] EWCA Crim 1295.79. [2011] NICC 32.Ward another. This includes both formal monitoring by the Regulator, the UK Accreditation Service, etc. (seee.g. Tully et a......
  • Legal versus non-legal approaches to forensic science evidence
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 20-1, January 2016
    • 1 January 2016
    ...n. 28 at [23] quoted in R v T [2010] EWCA Crim 2439 at [93]; R v Reed, above n. 7 at [112]; Dlugosz, above n. 7 at [5]; R v Thomas [2011] EWCA Crim 1295 at [36]; Otway, above n. 8 at [22]. 40. See above n. 25.41. Clare and Peach, above n. 22 at 338 quoting Menzies [1982] 1 NZLR 40. See also......