R v Togher; R v Doran; R v Parsons
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 2000 |
| Date | 2000 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
36 cases
-
R v Kearns (Nicholas Gary)
...between section 2(1) of the 1968 Act and Article 6 follows from the analysis of this Court set out in the judgment of Lord Woolf CJ in R v Togher [2001] 3 All ER 463, in particular at paragraph 33. We also note that in Brown v Stott [2001] 2 WLR 817 at 825, Lord Bingham of Cornhill stated t......
-
T v R
...of process is established such that renders it unfair to try the defendant at all. As Lord Woolf CJ observed in R v Togher & others [2001] 1 Cr App R 33 at paragraph 31, “Certainly, if it would be right to stop a prosecution on the basis that it was an abuse of process, this Court would be......
-
Ismail Abdurahman v R
...between’, particularly where the judgment is that of ‘a substantial majority in the Grand Chamber’. Reliance is placed on R v Togher [2001] 1 Cr App R 33, [30] (Lord Woolf CJ); R (Anderson) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2003] 1 AC 837, [18] (Lord Bingham); and R (Dowsett) v......
- R v Craven (Stephen)
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Subject Index
...279R v Templer [2003] NZCA 85 ........... 277R v Tibbs [2000] 2 Cr App R 309 ...... 115R v Tobin [2002] EWCA Crim 190 .. 203R v Togher [2001] 3 All ER 463.............................................. 32, 33, 60R v Turnbull [1977] QB 224 ..... 241, 245R v Turner [1975] QB 834, CA ................