R v (v) (2004)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | LORD JUSTICE KEENE |
| Judgment Date | 12 February 2004 |
| Neutral Citation | [2004] EWCA Crim 355 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Docket Number | No. 2003/04130/A7 |
| Date | 12 February 2004 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
7 cases
-
Beres Douglas v R
...where challenges on the basis of inconsistent verdicts have unsurprisingly failed: e.g. R v Bell (unreported 15 May 1997) and R v VV [2004] EWCA Crim 355.’ 49 These principles have been applied in several other cases from the English Court of Appeal. In R v Littlewood [2004] EWCA Crim 1648 ......
-
Sukhbir Dhillon v The Crown
...where challenges on the basis of inconsistent verdicts have unsurprisingly failed: e.g. ( R v Bell unreported 15 May 1997) and R v VV [2004] EWCA Crim 355. 42 This case does not, however, fall into that category. Here the various alleged offences are simply different facets or acts in the c......
-
R v Menachem Levy
...depends upon the uncorroborated account of a single complainant, and the jury convicts on one count but acquits on another. As it was put in R v G [1998] Crim LR 483 by Buxton LJ, neither credibility nor reliability is a seamless robe. A jury is entitled to accept part of a complainant's ev......
-
Gennadij Raivich v The Queen
...single complainant, and the jury convicts on one count but acquits on another, neither credibility nor reliability being a seamless robe (see R v G [1998] Crim LR 483 per Buxton LJ). Having made that point, Elias LJ goes on (in Dhillon at [41]): "Generally, therefore, in sex cases where it ......
Request a trial to view additional results