R v Wilson, ex parte Battersea Borough Council

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1947
Date1947
CourtKing's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
15 cases
  • R Martin Kay v Scan-Thors (UK) Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 23 Mayo 2018
    ...is a judicial function involving the exercise of a discretion which is subject to control by judicial review (see e.g. R v Wilson ex parte Battersea Borough Council [1948] 1 KB 43; R v Manchester Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Hill [1983] 1 AC 328). 21 In the much-quoted case of R v West ......
  • Sookoonsingh v Summary Ct
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 21 Marzo 2006
    ...R. v. Willesden JJ., ex p. ClemmingsUNK(1987), 87 Cr. App. R. 280, referred to. (15) R. v. Wilson, ex p. Battersea Borough Council, [1947] 2 All E.R. 569, considered. (16) Rice v. Connolly, [1966] 2 Q.B. 414; [1966] All E.R. 649, followed. (17) Walsh v. Jewell, Supreme Ct. of W. Australia, ......
  • R v Brentford Justices, ex parte Catlin
    • United Kingdom
    • Divisional Court
    • Invalid date
    ...1 All E.R. 904, D.C. Reg. v. Shaw (1865) 10 Cox. C.C. 66, C.C.A. Rex v. Wilson, Ex parte Battersea Borough Council [1948] 1 K.B. 43; [1947] 2 All E.R. 569, D.C. APPLICATION for an order of certiorari. The applicant, Anne Tricia Catlin, applied for an order of certiorari to quash her convict......
  • Michael Prest v The Magistrate of District “C”
    • St Kitts & Nevis
    • High Court (Saint Kitts and Nevis)
    • 18 Marzo 2022
    ...outlines the procedure to be adopted by a magistrate when considering whether to grant such a warrant. In the case of R v. Wilson; Ex Parte Battersea Borough Council 5 it was stated that “a summons is the result of a judicial act. It is the result of a complaint which has been made to a mag......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Recent Judicial Decisions
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles No. 53-1, January 1980
    • 1 Enero 1980
    ...whether or not to issue a summons has beensaid to be acting in a judicial capacity - R. v. Wilson Ex parteBattersea Borough Council [1948] 1 K.B. 43. There is a duty todetermine whether what is alleged is an offence known to law andwhether the essential elements are present.Itmust also beas......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT