Ravenscroft v Rederiaktiebologet Transatlantic

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date26 March 1991
Date26 March 1991
CourtQueen's Bench Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
8 cases
  • Alcock and Others v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 28 November 1991
    ...by a third party. On that basis it is open to serious doubt whether Hevican v. Ruane [1991] 3 All E.R. 65 and Ravenscroft v. Rederiaktiebolaget Transatlantic [1991] 3 All E.R. 73 were correctly decided, since in both of these cases the effective cause of the psychiatric illness would appe......
  • Pang Koi Fa v Lim Djoe Phing
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 2 July 1993
    ... ... Alcock , was subsequently followed in the Court of Appeal in Rederiaktiebolaget Transatlantic v Ravenscroft , where the court in considering the remarks that had been made in Alcock , ... ...
  • Copoc et al. v. Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire Police,
    • Canada
    • 28 November 1991
    ...417, consd. [para. 7]. Hevican v. Ruane, [1991] 3 All E.R. 65, not apprvd [para. 7]. Ravenscroft v. Rederiaktiebolaget Transatlantic, [1991] 3 All E.R. 73, not apprvd [para. Hambrook v. Stokes Bros., [1925] 1 K.B. 141, dist. [para. 18]. McKew v. Holland and Hannen and Cubitts (Scotland) Ltd......
  • Taylor v Somerset Health Authority
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Dissenting Judgments in the Law Preliminary Sections
    • 28 August 2018
    ...See Kane v Radley-Kane Ransomes Plc, Re [1999] 2 BCLC 591, CA 127 Table of Cases xxxiii Ravenscroft v Rederiaktiebølaget Transatlantic [1991] 3 All ER 73, (1991) 141 NLJ 600 188 Raymond Burke Motors Ltd v The Mersey Docks and Harbour Co [1986] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 155 94 Read v J Lyons & Co Ltd [1......
  • The Banker's Perspective Lord Millett's Dissent in Twinsectra Ltd v Yardley [2002] UKHL 12, [2002] 2 AC 164
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Dissenting Judgments in the Law Part III - Equity and Property Law
    • 28 August 2018
    ...Twinsectra ? Well, perhaps, to borrow a phrase from the judgment of Ward J in the case of Ravenscroft Rederiaktiebølaget Transatlantic [1991] 3 All ER 73 at 76, it will be a battered treasure, certainly from the perspective of Mr Leach. 49 And, of course, ignoring the issues of (apparently)......