Ravenscroft v Rederiaktiebologet Transatlantic
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 26 March 1991 |
| Date | 26 March 1991 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
9 cases
-
Alcock and Others v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police
...by a third party. On that basis it is open to serious doubt whether Hevican v. Ruane [1991] 3 All E.R. 65 and Ravenscroft v. Rederiaktiebolaget Transatlantic [1991] 3 All E.R. 73 were correctly decided, since in both of these cases the effective cause of the psychiatric illness would appe......
-
Pang Koi Fa v Lim Djoe Phing
... ... Alcock , was subsequently followed in the Court of Appeal in Rederiaktiebolaget Transatlantic v Ravenscroft , where the court in considering the remarks that had been made in Alcock , ... ...
-
Leonard (Martha Elizabeth Philomena) v Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland and Ministry of Defence
...each of the recent decisions at first instance of Hevican v Ruane [1991] 3 All ER 65 andRavenscroft v Rederiaktiebolaget Transatlantic [1991] 3 All ER 73 is open to serious doubt. (3) Mere mental suffering, although reasonably foreseeable, if unaccompanied by physical injury, is not a basis......
-
Copoc et al. v. Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire Police, (1991) 131 N.R. 194 (HL)
...417, consd. [para. 7]. Hevican v. Ruane, [1991] 3 All E.R. 65, not apprvd [para. 7]. Ravenscroft v. Rederiaktiebolaget Transatlantic, [1991] 3 All E.R. 73, not apprvd [para. Hambrook v. Stokes Bros., [1925] 1 K.B. 141, dist. [para. 18]. McKew v. Holland and Hannen and Cubitts (Scotland) Ltd......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...See Kane v Radley-Kane Ransomes Plc, Re [1999] 2 BCLC 591, CA 127 Table of Cases xxxiii Ravenscroft v Rederiaktiebølaget Transatlantic [1991] 3 All ER 73, (1991) 141 NLJ 600 188 Raymond Burke Motors Ltd v The Mersey Docks and Harbour Co [1986] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 155 94 Read v J Lyons & Co Ltd [1......
-
The Banker's Perspective Lord Millett's Dissent in Twinsectra Ltd v Yardley [2002] UKHL 12, [2002] 2 AC 164
...Twinsectra ? Well, perhaps, to borrow a phrase from the judgment of Ward J in the case of Ravenscroft Rederiaktiebølaget Transatlantic [1991] 3 All ER 73 at 76, it will be a battered treasure, certainly from the perspective of Mr Leach. 49 And, of course, ignoring the issues of (apparently)......