Re AB & Company

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1900
Date1900
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
10 cases
  • Cooke v The Charles A. Vogeler Company
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 14 December 1900
  • Office of Fair Trading v Lloyds TSB Bank Plc
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 12 November 2004
    ...to which it extends …" This principle is clearly supported by the authorities; see, for example, The Amalia (1863) 1 Moo PCCNS 471; and Re AB & Co [1900] 1 QB 541, where Lindley MR stated at p 544 as follows: "What authority or right has the court to alter in this way the status of foreigne......
  • Holmes v Bangladesh Biman Corporation
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 16 February 1989
    ...prior to 1879, must have been intended to be a reference to the Parliament of the United Kingdom. 78 Ex parte Blain was followed in In re A.B. & Co. [1900] 1 Q.B. 541, another bankruptcy case, in which Lindley M.R. said, at pp. 544-545: "What authority or right has the court to alter in t......
  • Poynter v Commerce Commission
    • New Zealand
    • Supreme Court
    • 16 April 2010
    ...or necessary implication. 30 37 These principles are underpinned by considerations of international comity. As Lord Lindley MR put it in Re A B & Co, 31 “unless Parliament has conferred upon the Court that power in language which is unmistakable, the Court is not to assume that Parliament i......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT