Cooke v The Charles A. Vogeler Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 14 December 1900 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1900] UKHL J1214-1 |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Date | 14 December 1900 |
[1900] UKHL J1214-1
House of Lords
After hearing Counsel on Thursday the 2nd day of August last upon the Petition and Appeal of AIf Cooke, of Crown Point Works, Leeds, in the county of York, praying, That the matter of the Order set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely, an Order of Her Majesty's Court of Appeal, of the 28th of February 1900, might be reviewed before Her Majesty the Queen in Her Court of Parliament, and that the said Order might be reversed, varied, or altered, or that the Petitioner might have such other relief in the premises as to Her Majesty the Queen, in Her Court of Parliament, might seem meet; as also upon the printed Case of the Charles A. Vogeler Company, lodged in answer to the said Appeal; And due consideration being had this day of what was offered on either side in this Cause:
It is Ordered and Adjudged by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in the Court of Parliament of Her Majesty the Queen assembled, That the said Order of Her Majesty's Court of Appeal, of the 28th day of February 1900, complained of in the said Appeal, be, and the same is hereby, Affirmed, and that the said Petition and Appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed this House: And it is further Ordered, That the Appellant do pay or cause to be paid, to the said Respondents the Costs...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
SCM NO. 16 OF 2009; Dr. Allan Marat Attorney General of Papua New Guinea and The Independent State of Papua New Guinea v Hanjung Power Limited (2014) SC1357
...give effect to it whether I like it or not. The words of the Earl of Halsbury L.C. are fitting in Cooke v. The Charles A. Vogeler Company [1901] A.C 102 at 107: “But a court of law has nothing to do with the reasonableness or unreasonableness of a provision...If the law has intended, and ha......
-
R Tony Michael Jimenez v The First Tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (First Respondent) HM Commissioners for Revenue and Customs (Second Respondent)
...Ex parte Blain (1879) 12 ChD 522 and was commented on with the approval of the Earl of Halsbury LC, in Cooke v Charles A Vogeler Company [1901] AC 102. Two passages from the judgements in Ex parte Blain (1879) 12 ChD 522 are directly relevant to the issue in this case. First, a passage from......
-
R (MK (Iran)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
...Court of Appeal in Ex parte Blain, and was commented on with approval by the Earl of Halsbury L.C. in Cooke v. Charles A. Vogeler Co. [1901] A.C. 102. Two passages from the judgments in Blain's case, 12 Ch.D. 522 are directly relevant to the issue in this case. First, a passage from the jud......
-
Clark v Oceanic Contractors Inc.
...in Ex parte Blain 12 Ch.D. 522, and was commented on with approval by the Earl of Halsbury L.C. in Cooke v. Charles A. Vogeler Company [1901] A.C. 102, at p. 107. Two passages from the judgments in Blain's case are directly relevant to the issue in this case. First, a passage from the judg......